Search Eternally Blessed Archive

Search by passage (e.g., John 3:16), keyword (e.g., Jesus, prophet, etc.) or topic (e.g., salvation)

ACTS 1:9-20 - Corps Notes - September 30, 1975

3rdburglar by Wordburglar
Topic: logospedia,lp
Format: mp3,pdf
Publication Date: September 30, 1975

On Ephesians 4:25 where I want to begin tonight, or where we will begin tonight , the first part of what the Research Team gave me is the work that Walter Cummins published in our wonderful Way Magazine on "The Spoken Word." Also, as we cover Ephesians 4:28 tonight, I had all the information in front of me from another article that Walter Cummins has in the... has had in the Magazine. The first article on Ephesians 4:25 is entitled "The Spoken Word." The one on Ephesians 4:28 is "Workers for God." Both of these pieces of work by Walter are absolutely superb. And I believe that they should appear and will appear in our research journal GMIR whenever we begin publishing that. {GMIR Aramaic word meaning ' to perfect, accomplish , mature, complete, arithmetically to be divisible without any remainder.}

And I noticed again that some of the things that were stated are just so beautifully and logically presented, I'm truly thankful for, not only Walter, but the whole Research Department. I think our Biblical Research Department is just second to none. And it' s even going to be better by God' s mercy and grace next year and in years to come than it is at this time. And right now I do not believe that our Biblical Research Department needs to take a back seat for any academic institution or work in the world.

And I thought today, I have never... I've never thought of Walter Cummins in any other capacity than to be my assistant. I know Vince Finnegan, you know, on the books is my assistant. And that' s great. But I've never thought of Walter Cummins in any other capacity for so many years as always being my assistant. And I think he' s just the most wonderful person that any president could have as his assistant. And also to be chairmen of the Department of Greek, and then the coordinator of the Biblical research of The Way International. For any one man to have that position and that responsibility is an awesome reality and I'm real proud of Walter and real thankful for him. But I am also thankful for the rest of our wonderful men and women in the Research Department.

I would like for the Corps all over the country to go to the Magazine and find "The Spoken_Word," that's the title of it, dealing with Ephesians 4:25 and other scriptures, and before the next Corps meeting next week, you endeavor to master that great piece of work by Walter Cummins. It's just, you know, the spoken Word. Over fifty Greek words are used in the New Testament in connection with the faculties of utterance. Over fifty. And then he takes the most important ones and he lists them and it' s just. .. it' s just a piece of research work that you should really as a Corps master in your heart and in your life.

Ephesians 4:25 in the King James reads, Wherefore put away lyin g, speak every man truth with his neighbor: for we are members one of another.

The ' putting away' was interesting to me again because of the Greek word aniko, a-n-i-k-o.

And this word is ' the putting away,' this word ' put away,' aniko, is the same root word as in 4:22, where we use the word ' rest,' meaning ' to rest.' Is that right? Yep, that is right. I taught you that,

didn't I? Did I or didn't I? Doesn't look right to me. It is the same root. What chapter am I missing? Am I missing anything? I don't know. Right now I'm screwed up, ha ha. First time today. You check the word again and I'll do that, too and see what I'm missing here.

But a-n-i-k-o is the word for ' putting away from you. ' To put away. And it' s the same root as the word ' rest.' I don't know where the word appears, but it's got to be in there.

Now, that word ' speak,' every man speak. That word ' speak ' is from the Greek word

laleo, l-a-l-e-long-o. And that' s where Walter' s article on "The Spoken Word"_c omes in because that is.. .he uses that word laleo in here, which I teach in Corinthians when I teach the Foundational Class. And he says the word is employed 24 times in I Corinthians chapter 14. I had forgotten that.

This word is truly significant. I couldn' t quite understand it Research Department, what  you said on page 26B 16, where you defined it ' to make vocal utterance,' ' to babble,' 'to talk,'  'to  exercise the faculty of speech without reference to the words spoken.' I just wondered if there might not be another word that could be substituted or utilized at this point. I know that Zachariah 8:16 is the quotation that is used here, or spoken of. And that Zachariah 8:16 adds force to what is said by using a quote, a quotation. That' s why my question to the Research Department is, How can it be without reference to what is spoken if it is truth plus the quotation of the Word of God that's given. It doesn't quite fit for me.

'With his neighbor' has to be a believing neighbor. This 'speak truth with his neighbor' is a figure of speech gnome, g-n-o-m-e, which simply is a citation. And that' s a citation from Zachariah 8:16.

There are a series of figures of speech, Corps, in chapter four which just put the 00mph, the highlight, to the particular things that are set whereby you put off the old man. This phrase here 'speak every man truth with his neighbor'  is one of them. The other one appears in verse 26, 'be  angry and sin not.' ' Steal no more' is another one. 'Corrupt communication' is the fourth one.  'Grieve not the  holy spirit' is the fifth one. ' All bitterness, wrath, anger, clamor, evil speaking' is  the sixth. And  then  ' be kind' and so forth, is the seventh.

You see, the last phrase in that verse, in King James, For we' re members one of what? [Another] And it' s relative to the neighbor. Now you just look at that. Wherefore put away  lying, speak  every  man truth with his what? [Neighbor] For we are members  one of  another.  That  doesn't  mean just  a neighbor who lives next door, but it has to be a believing neighbor because  we are members  one of what? [Another]. You could not be a member ' one of another' ifhe  was an  unbeliever.  That's how I know this is going to  work. This tells me that the neighbor  is  a  believer.  And  this  ' we' re members one of another' continues the imagery of the Body of Christ.

The literal  according  to  usage of this verse is as follows:   Wherefore  put away the  lie... and I believe in my heart, before I go on with the literal that until man is born again, it's all a lie anyways. And that' s why I believe that this translation will fit in the light of that knowledge. Because when  a man is not born again, his whole  life is just a  lie. Now you're  born again,  and that ' s  why  I think the text states it ' wherefore put away the lie,' the life you' ve been living , the screwed up life you have lived outside of God. It' s been just a life of a lie. It' s not truth. It' s just the opposite of truth and that's my reason for translating it this way... Wherefore put away the lie.

You've got to go with that translation. You have no other text to go by both from Aramaic and Greek it's 'lie.' Not 'lying.' If the Research Department has anything to share in the light of that, I'd be blessed to hear, but you' ve heard my reasons for translating it, Research Department, this way.

Now since they're born again, their whole life is changed, so the life of lying, and living a lie, and being a lie, and being false, is to be put away.

And every man... this is the translation ... and everyone, everyone. The word ' man' you could use because it's an inclusive noun, but I prefer to use the word ' one.'

Wherefore put away the lie and everyone speak the truth with his neighbor for we are members one of another. That is literal according to usage.

Now for the expanded according to understanding. It's not bad. Because of this... What we coughing for? Everybody sick?...Because of this... and the reason I went in the expanded along this line is because verse 24 last week told us that we are created by God in righteousness and in true purity, through holiness. Twenty four.

That's why 25, Wherefore ... 'wherefore' can be translated 'because of this.' Because of this what? Being created in righteousness and truly pure. See it's an inside job.

Because of this being created in righteousness and truly pure by the grace and the love of

God.. .Because of this being created in righteousness and truly pure, you put away, completely lay to rest the lie that you have been and were living and each one of you speak the truth using a quotation from the Word with his believing neighbor for we are members one of another in the Body of the Church.

Robinson {Edward} said, he translated, 'speak every man truth with his neighbor' and he said it's from Zachariah 8:16 which adds force to what is said by using a quote. That's why I translated that. I think that' s great. It adds force to what is said. If you're speaking to someone, it adds force to what you say by using a quote, a quotation from God's Word. In other words, ' you share the Word with them.' That' s why I went with that translation. I want to give it to you again in this sense.

Speak the truth using a quotation from the Word, which means 'share the Word.' Quote the Word to them. Tell them what the Word says, with his believing neighbor. Why? For we are members one of another in the Body of the Church. This verse is just mind blowing.

Here, you have a born-again believer neighbor who needs to grow up a little more. So what do you do? Each one speak the truth to that neighbor, that believer, using the Word, quoting the Word because we' re members one of another in the Body of the Church. It's a real positive thing to do.

Verse 26 in King James reads, Be angry.. .ha ha... we like that one, don't we. Be ye angry and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath.

Here is a verse of Scripture that' s very, very difficult for most people. And it' s not too easy for us either. But I think we are able to share the truth of the greatness of this and it's been burning in my heart for a long time to do this with our people.

Everybody has problems with ' how can you be angry and not sin?' You know, how can raise hell with something and not be sinful in doing it? Teed off and not be sinful. And how can you go... and what does it mean 'don't let the sun go down upon your wrath?' See.

In the context, here, verses 26 and 27 deal with your believing neighbor, specifically. Then the Greek word for ' anger' which is from the root orge, o-r-g-long-e means 'anger together with the desire of revenge .' That' s bad. That' s a heavy. The Hebrew word means ' to kill, and all the tumults of passion that terminate in killing.' So it's a real heavy word when it said ' be angry.'

And the way I believe it's used in God' s Word, ' be ye angry' means ' it's a long time anger with your believing neighbor until a change has ensued.' The desire to... of revenge is a change. And I, knowing the Word in the light of the new birth, it's where a change finally comes about. Until that time, you just, long-term, you just stay put witnessing the Word, sharing the Word. You do not dislike the believing neighbor; you simply dislike that he is not fully accepting the Word and walking on it. So it' s a long-term anger until a change has ensued. You just stay faithful.

I don't know what else to do with those words. It is a righteous anger. Yet it is a righteous anger without sin.

Among the scholars, there is a disagreement on these words. Well, I don't know about my being a scholar; that I don' t anything about being about. But it's simple to me because righteous anger is commanded by God's Word when it says ' be ye angry.' Well, the scholars can fight about it. I don' t care. It' s a command. Not just permitted to get teed once in a while when somebody' s off of God' s Word, a believer is off of God's Word. You' re always teed off righteously at any believer, born-again believer, who is off of God' s Word. And for those of us in the Way Ministry, it' s been a lifetime.

Get into it with them on... Oh what subject do you want to talk about? Baptism? Food? One God? See. All that stuff.

The Aramaic is accurate in the words ' and sin not.' It literally translates ' and you will not sin.' Again, this ' be angry and sin not' is that figure gnome. Quotation. A citation from the Old Testament. It' s from Psalm 4:4. But in King James, Psalm 4:4, it's translated 'stand in awe.' The real sense of the Hebrew is ' one of admonition;' sin not. Where we' re admonished to not sin. Sin not.

' Let not the sun go down on your wrath. ' Ha ha. That again is beautiful. People went to bed when the sun went down, when it got dark. That's when they went to bed. So what that simply is saying, ha ha, ' don't go to bed teed off.' Don' t let the sun go down on your wrath. In other words, go to bed; don' t go to bed mad. ' When you go to bed' is what it means. Let not the sun go down when you go to bed. And they went to bed when the sun went down. When it got dark, they went to bed, see.

' Upon your wrath.' And the word ' wrath' here is basically ' irritation.' Ha ha. Previously when I taught Ephesians, I made mention of this fact, ' don' t let righteous anger shake you, wondering if it was right on. When you go to bed, go to sleep.'

Now, this is what we have done with it in the literal, ha ha, according to usage. I got more papers up here than Carter has liver pills, or something. Then, I can' t find my... whatever it is I take off of it.

Okay, verse 26. You be righteously angry.. .this is literal according to usage.. .and you will not be sinning. Don't go to bed even with a momentary irritation, ha ha.

I don't think you get nearly as much fun out of this as I do. It's neat. It's absolutely scrumptious, see. At the opening, is that heavy word, remember? Anger. So it's a real heavy time. So what he is saying, in the heavy time, when your standing on God' s Word  and sharing that with the  believing  neighbor, you' re righteously angry... you're not sinning. And  you don't  even go to  bed with a momentary irritation. In other Words, when you go to bed, thank God the day is over. Say your last prayer and start snoring.

Boy, that would save a lot of sleeping pills, wouldn' t it? Practicing that principle. Boy, oh boy, what a tremendous Word. And hardly anybody understands verse 26. They argue about it, but they don' t get the understanding.

Now this is the expanded one according to understanding, I hope. And again, I would like to just lay some things before the Corps, and especially before the Research Department. I translated the first part of verse 26, You always stay angry with an all-out desire to have them to change which anger will not be sin on your part.

Then I have another translation of that first part of it: You be righteously angry, 'teed off' with sin... 'Teed off' I put in quotes. But don't  you sin  by acting  ' holier than thou'  vaunting  yourself  by acting so righteously like you never sin.

I do not know which one of those two the Research Department feels would be the better. The last part of the phrase that I translated which would go with both of these that I have given you here on the expanded one for understanding. This, the last part, goes with that first one and with the second ... also.. .even if it is only a momentary irritation.  When you go to  bed, go to sleep. That's what I did with it.

Now, verse 27. King James says, Neither (or neither) give place to the Devil. The word 'place' is simply a portion, a part. No believer will give full place to the Devil, but he may be giving a part, a portion. He' ll mark off a spot, ' this is Devil' s permission over here, over here, no permission, you know. And you really give the Devil a portion or a spot if you stew about it after you go to bed and you toss and you tum and can' t sleep.

This word 'the Devil,' ' the Devil' in the Aramaic is a very interesting and exciting Word to me and it blesses my heart. It' s a compound word where the first part means ' to eat' or ' to devour.' The latter

' to slander' or ' to accuse. '  So when I got to translating  this, literally according  to usage, verse 27 reads: Do not give any portion or space or an opportunity to the Devil. So I used those three words synonymously: portion, space, opportunity. Do not give any portion or space or an opportunity to the Devil.

The expanded according to understanding: And you will not give a toehold, an opportunity or an occasion for the Devil to eat you. Ha ha. I get more fun than you ever will out of working this stuff, huh.

You see, and to me, that communicates to my understanding. John 10:10. The thief cometh not but for to what? [Steal, kill, and destroy] Right. To eat you out. To beat you. And that's why that Aramaic word, on the word ' Devil' really thrilled me.

And that ' s why I put it into the expanded translation: And you will not give a ' toehold.' Now, at L.E.A.D., you know how important it is to get a what? [Toehold] Ha ha. And when you' re really climbing in, you' re blessed for a toehold. How thankful you are when you get a foothold. Now the adversary can never get a foothold in a believer' s life until he first has a toehold. That's why I translated it that way.

Do not give... and you will not give a toehold ... shave all the rocks off... an opportunity or an occasion for the Devil to eat you. And that' s exactly what he likes to do to believers.

Now we go to verse 28. King James says, Let him that stole steal not more: but rather let him labor, working with his hands the thing which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth. And here again, is another great work that I believe should be in our research journal GMIR, Walter' s work on " Workers for God."

It' s just tremendous where he... you know... he just goes into God' s men are called many things in the Word. They' re called: fellow workers, ministers, or servants, slaves, fellow slaves, partners, messengers, soldiers, fellow soldiers, athletes, fellow athletes, stewards, ambassadors, witnesses, all of those. And he covers them so beautifully. And I love very much how he covered the word ' slave,' because it' s a much stronger word than to be a minister, or to be a servant. It is to be one who is branded, marked out, sold out. And baby, from that day on, there are no ifs, and' s, or but' s. You never budge on it. You are branded. Most believers are never branded. They may be servants, they may be ministers, but they are not branded. When you' re branded, you stay faithful. You do not budge. You do not change. You stay put. If all hell breaks loose, you still live the believing Word.

I think the prophet once said, If I was in the midst of hell, God I know you' d be there. (Psalm 139:8) He' d be there. That' s the doulos. That, of course, is just a tremendous piece of work.

And the other great part that I think... and this is a second piece that I want the Corps to master before next Wednesday night, " Workers for God," the work on ' witness.' You see, it's the same word basically that's translated ' martyr,' see. And we got a lot of those canonized. That's not at all what a witness is. A witness is a living example, not a dead one. The word 'martyr' simply means that you lay down your life in witnessing. And boy, when you put the doulos together with ' witness,' then you' ve got power for abundant living. It's just a fantastic work by Walter and I' m real grateful that it was published. Because once it' s in print, people can take a look at it if they want to.

I'd like a cup of coffee, please.

Now, we are in verse 28. The Aramaic translation is ' and he who was stealing.' I understand it from the English, ' let him that stole,' past tense. The Aramaic is real simple, real strong. ' And he, the one who is born again, who was, past tense, stealing.'

Thank you.

His whole life was one of those before he was born again.

Whenever you bring a cup of coffee to a right-hand man, you put the handle to the right. When you serve a cup of coffee to a left-hand man, you put it on the left-hand side and put the handle to the left. Corps principle number seven or something, ha ha. Mrs. Wierwille would say, Well, be thankful you even get a cup of coffee. [Laughter] Ah, you're wonderful.

See, ' let him who stole, steal no more.' 'Stole and steal,' that' s a figure of speech and is polyptoton p-o-l-y-p-t-o-t-o-n. It' s a repetition of the same root word in different parts of speech or reflections. But, that's not earth shaking right now in my heart.

You see, in some Eastern culture, it was not considered a sin or a shame to steal because that's the way they lived, the only way they lived. Somebody told me... or not only told me, one of our people, but it was in a national magazine, that the basic culture of Russia today is to steal. And in some respects I can understand this. If you don't have anything and you're starving to death and there' s a loaf of bread you can get a hold of... steal the dam thing. I understand that.

So this verse is really sharp, really sharp. Let him who stole, even though that man previously considered it the way to live and there was no shame in it, no sin in it. He said, Well, let that fellow who stole, steal no more. Something has happened on the inside of that man. Something that happened, where He is able to meet all of our need according to His riches in glory. Christ in you, the hope of glory. More than conquerors.

A record in the Old Testament, I forget where it is, but it's in there, that it' s never, you never need to borrow or steal bread or... what is that in the Old Testament? Begging bread. One person stand and tell me. {Psalm 37:25, I have been young and now am old; yet have I seen the righteous forsaken, nor His seed begging bread.} Psalm 27:25 who? {Psalm 37:25} 37:25. All the years, he's never seen the righteous to have to do what? {Beg bread} Beg bread.

First of all, I wish the Christian world could hear this. Secondly, I wish our government in the United States could understand it. The Word says, If you don't work, you don' t eat. A lot of that stuff. Well, what we've been doing is stealing from the people who are willing to work to give to the people who don' t want to work. That's a bunch of crap. That's stealing. That's why this verse is so hot in my soul tonight. Let him who stole, quit stealing, dang it. See.

Many years ago I was really knocked for a loop along some of this line in India, from Dr. Williams. I think he loved India maybe like I love the United States, I don' t know. Because only a man knows how much he loves his own country, I guess.

But... as we were traveling together, he said to me, Dr. Wierwille, I hear you have whores in the United States.

You know, I never had given it a thought. I just took it for granted. [Laughter] And I said, yeah. He said, Why does a rich country like the United States have whores?

And I said, I don't know.

And he said, I can't understand it. Cannot your women make enough money to live? Yeah, but they figure that' s cheaper and more pleasurable or something, I don' t know. And he said, Well, I think it's sinful that the United States has whores.

And I said, What do you mean?

And he said to me, why, I can understand India. He said we don' t enough food, we don' t have enough of anything hardly for a lot of people. And we have whores because that' s the only way they can continue to live physically.

And I thought to myself, well boy, that' s slapping me in the face good. And I took it as a wonderful lesson. There is no excuse in the United States for any women being a whore because she doesn' t need to get screwed and paid for it in order to get money so she can live. There's plenty of work available and if there isn' t she ought to get born again, then there' s a guarantee of work. ..other work, available. I tell you, when you' re honest, some of these men in other countries have some real logic behind their thinking. How would you have liked to have handled that? I just simply admitted, Well, I think we' re wrong in the United States. But I said, I think you' re wrong in India, too, because no reason to have whores here if you get them born again.

So I don' t know. But this verse today as I worked the final working on this verse 28 is when my heart really went back and burned with that truth that Dr. Williams had stated. Because in many Eastern cultures, it was not considered as sin or as shame to steal, if it was a matter of livelihood. You sometimes wonder who will live in the greatest condemnation before God and justice and judgment when the time comes.

For in most of what are called poor countries even, there is sufficient money, food, and other things for the people to live if those in positions of authority were not so selfish and egotistical, and want it for themselves , and let the rest of the world die... or a country die.

The word ' labor' in verse 28 is the word which literally means ' hard work resulting in fatigue.' That's how I felt coming from the woods last night. And I didn' t do anything. It was just hard work being there with the rest of you. Today I got so tired of being with some, I came home. Ah, you' re wonderful.

' Working with his hands' is an Eastern cultural type of thing. Today in our culture, you could have it, you know, the truth is working with your mind or working with your hand, whatever you' re working at. But in Eastern culture, every son was to be trained to work with his hands, even if he was the son of a king. Had to learn a trade, a profession of business.

Jesus Christ was a saddle maker. He made them to ride, I guess, what do you want? Tennessee Walkers , or? See. I think not only did he do that, Paul did it, too, you know. Someday I'm going to find a...or Walter, or some of those, are going to find me a manuscript to prove it. .. and a wonderful carpenter by trade. Many times doing carpentry work and being a saddle maker were sort of in the same household, because building carpentry and having saddles to use for their business and carrying on, were very, very closely aligned. Well, I won' t argue the point, but I wish we' d keep looking.

II Thessalonians.. .Do your hands ever get so dry you can hardly hold anything? Golly, mine are so dry tonight, I wonder why? II Thessalonians, chapter 3:10... this we commanded you that if any would not work, neither should he what? [Eat] Right. Even unemployment is no excuse for stealing. He just doesn' t eat. Goes and gets work. Boy, when I first saw the greatness of these principles many years ago, and then of course, I uniquely by God' s grace, inculcated that into our W.O.W. program and very dynamically in the Corps leadership.

ACTS 1:9-20
September 30, 1975
Acts 1:9
“he” - Jesus
“they” - 12 apostles, including Judas
“cloud” - like encased within a cloud — I have no proof for this but if I were really putting a center
reference in here I would go back to the Old Testament where the children of Israel were led with the
cloud by day and the pillar of fire by night. I believe that is the kind of cloud situation. I have no
documentation in any text, but I think there’s great documentation in the Word. When the children of
Israel were covered with the cloud, Pharaoh couldn’t see them. I think another great truth is in verse
10.
Acts 1:10
‘‘while they looked stedfastly toward heaven’’ - As they looked up they couldn’t see anything
because he wasn’t there.
“two men” - Angels are many times spoken of as men. The cloud was a phenomenon. The
appearance of angels as men was phenomenon. It’s still possible for God to do it today and I’m sure
He does, but it’s not normative. When these angels appeared to the senses man they looked like men.
I don’t know where they ever got the wings on the angels in the pictures we see. The remarkable
thing is the great phenomenal truth that is here about these two men who stood by them in white
apparel. God could have chosen to do it by a voice from heaven. The reason He did not go that route
is because He added the appearance of these two angels.
In the beginning there were three arch angels, Lucifer, Michael and Gabriel. Lucifer was the bright
and morning star. He flipped. Jesus Christ became the bright and morning star. He ascended. I
believe these two were Michael and Gabriel. If you could put yourself in a top situation like that,
would you send your top two ambassadors or would you send a buck private? That’s why I believe
that written between the lines was that these angels were Gabriel and Michael. Now, another reason
why; Michael is the one who fights for God’s people; it is Gabriel who carries the new message, who
delivers it. Here we have God’s son, the bright and morning star, gathered up and the next verse is
going to be a new message.
Acts 1:11
Literal — “Why do you continue gazing up?” No use looking any further up since he’s gone.
“shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go” - shall come in like manner as you saw him
go into heaven. Just some short time before, they had said, “wilt thou restore the kingdom again to
Israel?” Then he is taken up and immediately the message is that he is coming back.
The first thing regarding the Lord Jesus Christ after the ascension is the return. The first statement is
that he is coming back. You see, when I put all of that together with man’s leaving this earth, the first
thing after death is the return, the gathering together. It’s all there. Not only is that true in practice but
the first thing is the hope, the hope of Christ’s return. Even today what keeps us going is the hope.
“in like manner” - It doesn’t say that they are going to see him come in like manner, in that verse. It
doesn’t say “as you are going to see him.” And that’s the only message these heavenly
representatives delivered as far as the Word is concerned- the return. Just jell this in your heart as the
years go by and think about it. That’s the only message they stated. They said nothing about building
the kingdom; they just said that he’s coming back. Then they disappeared.
“men of Galilee” - 11 apostles - Sometime between verse 10 and verse 11 before the angels
delivered their message, Judas Iscariot left because now we return in verse 12 to Jerusalem from the
mount called Olivet, and there are only 11 men coming back to Jerusalem.
Luke 24:50-51 - This is something you have to drive in your mind because it is absolutely different
from what the commentaries say, but it’s true. So the ascension occurred at Bethany. Bethany is on
the eastern side of the Mount of Olives.
Acts 1:12
“mount called Olivet” - This should read Mount of Olives.
“Sabbath day’s journey” - equals 1.16745 miles or 6164 feet (a little over a mile) - If the Bible
scholars are accurate on their measurements, then I’ve given it to you accurately. It wasn’t just in the
distance; it was in the attitude and the desire in your heart of what you did. Every time I think of a
Sabbath day’s journey I think of a man walking with his hands behind him and just enjoying the
walk. That’s what they allowed them to do on the Sabbath. There was also a law instituted that they
couldn’t go more than so far away from their home. Those Jews used to take a stone from their yard
and take it with them in their pocket and when they had walked that far then they’d put that stone
down so they could walk further.
“Then returned they unto Jerusalem” - Jesus Christ, in verse 4, had commanded them that they
should not depart from Jerusalem but wait until the promise of the Father. He told them to go back to
Jerusalem and after he ascended that’s what they did. The Word of God is the will of God. If they’d
have gone to New York, nothing would have happened; no more so than what happened to Judas
because he didn’t go back in Jerusalem. Those who believed the words of the Lord Jesus Christ went
back to Jerusalem.
Acts 1:13
“upper room” - I do not believe that this is the first time that they were ever in this upper room. I
believe it was the place where they had met previously and therefore when Jesus said to go back to
Jerusalem they would know what he meant. Otherwise, go back to Jerusalem — where? Every cause
has an effect and every effect has a cause. Because they had been there previously; I do not believe
Jesus had to tell them to go back to the upper room.
He just said to go back to Jerusalem. The reason they went to the upper room is because they just
knew that was what Jesus meant.
“abode” = where they stayed, slept
It lists all 11 here. I think God made sure that nobody would miss this truth. He not only said ye men
of Galilee in verse 11, but finally He had to list them because God knew they wouldn’t believe them
anyway. He gave the 11 names and people still don’t believe it. I think this is a tremendous proof that
Judas who had left between verse 10 and 11, it is documented that he left. It’s a double emphasis.
Acts 1:14
“one accord” = unity of purpose
“all” = all eleven
“supplication” = thanks, like thanksgiving. A lot of the texts omit this, but as far as I’m concerned
you can leave it in.
“with his brethren” = his half-brethren, as we would refer to it, same mother, different father.
Now we begin a marvelous record also that is absolutely astounding.
Acts 1:15
“those days” = days between the ascension and Pentecost. They only knew that Jesus Christ said to
return to Jerusalem and wait until the promise of the father came to pass. In those days of waiting and
tarrying, the only reason they had to wait was because it was not yet available, had not yet come. In
those days refers to the 8 days between the ascension and Pentecost.
“disciples” – some texts read ‘brethren’.
“number” = crowd
“number of names” - It’s a figure that means the number of people together.
“those days” - It’s not the day of Pentecost. It doesn’t say what day after the ascension it is but we
know it’s between the ascension and before the outpouring on the day of Pentecost.
“about 120” - It’s not an iron-clad number. This is in a parenthesis added for clarity.
You’ll see later that verses 18 and 19 are also a parenthesis. You have to become sharp enough in
your study of God’s Word that you see the parenthesis. There are a couple in King James that are
marked as parenthesis but they’re not parenthesis.
Acts 1:16
“Men and brethren” - I believe the about 120 were all men. Women weren’t numbered. Only men
were counted. That’s like, whenever there were 12 men who wanted to start a synagogue, in a
community they could have one. There were lots of women too, but the about 120 were the men.
When he addressed, he spoke to the men.
“This scripture must needs have been fulfilled” - Literally - This scripture had to be fulfilled (or is
fulfilled).
“the Holy Ghost” – the pneuma the hagion – Greek text, but just pneuma hagion
“by” = dia – by means of, or by way of.
“mouth of David” - did the speaking. David could not speak any other vocabulary than the one he
had, the one he utilized. This becomes very significant because if a man was possessed he could
speak other words than he ordinarily would in his vocabulary. Here is a great, great, great truth. God
gave it to David, David spoke it. I do not know of this quotation in the Old Testament. (Psalm 41:9;
Psalm 69:25; Psalm 109:8) These verses don’t refer specifically to Judas, for they do not
specifically name Judas Iscariot. Books on Old Testament prophecies fulfilled in the New Testament
are treacherous because so much is assumption. You can go to the Bible and find anything to
substantiate something that happened to someone in the New Testament, but unless the scripture in
the New Testament said that this was a quotation from a certain’ prophet, we just wouldn’t believe
what they indicate in the Bible. You have something here that is real foundational along these lines. I
don’t believe that the verses in Psalms were specifically given for Judas, even though Judas fits the
pattern for that revelation.
“took” = arrested
“spake” – covers that which is written at times and other times that which is not written. At times
you’ll find something in the Word that the prophet spoke but that it’s never written. He simply
verbally spoke it and at other times it is spoken to the end that it is recorded.
Acts 1:17
‘‘with’’ - among
Scratch “had”
“part”- Same word as word for lots in verse 26 and “take part” in verse 25
Judas was numbered among the eleven and obtained part of this ministry. How come he didn’t get
more? He split. He didn’t go back to Jerusalem into the upper room. That’s why he only obtained
part. He didn’t hang in there to receive what God had made available. He kicked up his heels against
God. God didn’t throw Judas out. Judas threw himself out. He had freedom of his will. He would
have received the fullness too if he had hung in there.
“ministry” = diakonia - deacon - obtained part of these services. I like the word ministry as a
translation here. It’s the ministry of an apostle, the service of an apostle. In verse 25 at the conclusion
of what they are going to in-act, it says that he may take part of the ministry - literally means
apostolic services.
Verses 18 and 19 are a parenthesis.
Acts 1:20
“Habitation” = homestead.
Acts 1:18
“now” - We can throw “now” out can’t we, according to the Greek? This man indeed then, not time,
but action. Now in the sense of “now I’ll tell you what he did.” If you say “now” referring to time, it
can’t be now according to time. But rather it is “now” I’m going to tell you what he did.
“this man” - This one refers to Judas.
“purchased” - “provided” in Matthew 10:9 - He provided it for himself because he did it with the
reward of iniquity the verse says.
“field” = chorion - property - He bought himself property on which there was a house. The Bible
commentaries say that the reward of iniquity was the 30 pieces of silver. This is not true. See John
12:4-6 - This is the reward of iniquity. He stole out of the bag and bought himself a property.
“falling headlong” – committed suicide by impaling himself on a sharp object.
“in the midst” - is not in the text, but that’s where he burst asunder.
Judas committed suicide; killed himself by impaling himself on a sharp instrument like a sword and
that’s why he burst asunder. His bowels burst out.
Acts 1:19
“all” = without distinction
“field” – chorion – property It wasn’t called this when he did it but later on it became called
Aceldama, not before he committed suicide but after he committed suicide.
“proper tongue” – vernacular language
“Aceldama” = the field of blood.
Impaled himself is Biblically hanging (had nothing to do with a rope). Hanging was always done,
impaled on a sharp instrument. After he committed suicide, when Peter lays this all out, it was called
the field of blood.
Matthew 27:1-10
Verse 3
“repented himself” = felt sorry
The reward of iniquity of Acts 1 cannot be the 30 pieces of silver in verse 3 because he is bringing it
back to the chief priests.
Verse 4
“the innocent blood” = Jesus Christ
Verse 5
He cast down the 30 pieces of silver, threw it in the temple and departed and went and hanged
himself. Matthew does not tell us when he hanged himself. Acts tells us when. Matthew simply tells
us that he went and hanged himself. We have implied that he went out immediately. We know he
could not have gone out immediately because Acts says that he was still there on the day of the
ascension. Here it is even before Jesus Christ died, so he could not have hanged himself before Christ
died and then be alive at the time of the ascension.
Verse 7
“bought” – means at a public market place.
They took counsel. They deliberately decided that they were going to the market place to buy the
potter’s field.
“field” - The word field here is “agros” not “chorion” as in Acts. This is a larger piece of land than a
property. They deliberately went out to buy the potter’s field to bury strangers in. The potter’s field
was where they buried the people who could not be properly buried.
Verse 8
“field” = agros
“Blood” = hemetos - field was called the field of blood later
People called it this because it was purchased with 30 pieces of silver which is called blood money.
That’s why it is called the agros of hemotos, not Aceldama, as in Acts.
Verses 9-10
30 pieces of silver was the lowest price you could pay for a slave; to buy a slave’s life you had to pay
30 pieces of silver. That’s what they paid for our Lord and Savior. That’s all they gave Judas for
betraying the Lord Jesus Christ, the price of a slave, the lowest down and out slave price is what they
paid.
So when you put together Matthew, it stands on its own and Acts stands on its own. Matthew is not
Acts. All the commentaries put these two together, and that is the reason for the confusion. They both
stand accurately on their own feet.
Let’s go over it in review. When Jesus Christ was betrayed by Judas, he had received 30 pieces of
silver to betray him to the authorities, the high priests. After he saw what they were doing to Jesus
and that Jesus was condemned, etc. he took the 30 pieces of silver deliberately back to the temple and
threw them in the temple. The priests held a top echelon meeting and decided they couldn’t receive
that money because it was tainted with blood; therefore, they made the decision to go to the public
market place, buy a field to bury people in who had no other place to be buried, the potter’s field.
That field later became called the field of blood. Judas, on the other hand, had stolen money and with
the stolen money, the reward of iniquity, he had purchased for himself a property, that’s all, and after
the ascension, between verse 10 and verse 11 in Acts, Judas went back home, and that’s just as
literally accurate as accurate. He literally went back home to his own property and there he fell
headlong, impaled himself on a sharp instrument, hanged himself, and that property of his became
known as the chorion of blood.
Look at the great logic in the book of Acts. Who chose the 12 apostles? Suppose Judas hanged
himself even before Jesus Christ was dead. Who logically do you think would have replaced Judas
when he was alive? And Jesus Christ became alive. Why did Jesus Christ not replace Judas? Because
he was still living. Now Jesus Christ ascends, Judas is dead and he goes out immediately and hangs
himself. They knew the Old Testament scriptures that that man had to be replaced; therefore, they did
it, the about 120, not Jesus. They did it before the day of Pentecost because he had just killed himself.
See how beautifully the Word fits together. So they elected Matthias.