Search Eternally Blessed Archive

Search by passage (e.g., John 3:16), keyword (e.g., Jesus, prophet, etc.) or topic (e.g., salvation)

Acts 1:4, 6 & 12-26 - Corps Notes - October 14, 1975

3rdburglar by Wordburglar
Topic: logospedia,lp
Format: mp3,pdf
Publication Date: October 14, 1975

On Ephesians 4:25 where I want to begin tonight, or where we will begin tonight , the first part of what the Research Team gave me is the work that Walter Cummins published in our wonderful Way Magazine on "The Spoken Word." Also, as we cover Ephesians 4:28 tonight, I had all the information in front of me from another article that Walter Cummins has in the... has had in the Magazine. The first article on Ephesians 4:25 is entitled "The Spoken Word." The one on Ephesians 4:28 is "Workers for God." Both of these pieces of work by Walter are absolutely superb. And I believe that they should appear and will appear in our research journal GMIR whenever we begin publishing that. {GMIR Aramaic word meaning ' to perfect, accomplish , mature, complete, arithmetically to be divisible without any remainder.}

And I noticed again that some of the things that were stated are just so beautifully and logically presented, I'm truly thankful for, not only Walter, but the whole Research Department. I think our Biblical Research Department is just second to none. And it' s even going to be better by God' s mercy and grace next year and in years to come than it is at this time. And right now I do not believe that our Biblical Research Department needs to take a back seat for any academic institution or work in the world.

And I thought today, I have never... I've never thought of Walter Cummins in any other capacity than to be my assistant. I know Vince Finnegan, you know, on the books is my assistant. And that' s great. But I've never thought of Walter Cummins in any other capacity for so many years as always being my assistant. And I think he' s just the most wonderful person that any president could have as his assistant. And also to be chairmen of the Department of Greek, and then the coordinator of the Biblical research of The Way International. For any one man to have that position and that responsibility is an awesome reality and I'm real proud of Walter and real thankful for him. But I am also thankful for the rest of our wonderful men and women in the Research Department.

I would like for the Corps all over the country to go to the Magazine and find "The Spoken_Word," that's the title of it, dealing with Ephesians 4:25 and other scriptures, and before the next Corps meeting next week, you endeavor to master that great piece of work by Walter Cummins. It's just, you know, the spoken Word. Over fifty Greek words are used in the New Testament in connection with the faculties of utterance. Over fifty. And then he takes the most important ones and he lists them and it' s just. .. it' s just a piece of research work that you should really as a Corps master in your heart and in your life.

Ephesians 4:25 in the King James reads, Wherefore put away lyin g, speak every man truth with his neighbor: for we are members one of another.

The ' putting away' was interesting to me again because of the Greek word aniko, a-n-i-k-o.

And this word is ' the putting away,' this word ' put away,' aniko, is the same root word as in 4:22, where we use the word ' rest,' meaning ' to rest.' Is that right? Yep, that is right. I taught you that,

didn't I? Did I or didn't I? Doesn't look right to me. It is the same root. What chapter am I missing? Am I missing anything? I don't know. Right now I'm screwed up, ha ha. First time today. You check the word again and I'll do that, too and see what I'm missing here.

But a-n-i-k-o is the word for ' putting away from you. ' To put away. And it' s the same root as the word ' rest.' I don't know where the word appears, but it's got to be in there.

Now, that word ' speak,' every man speak. That word ' speak ' is from the Greek word

laleo, l-a-l-e-long-o. And that' s where Walter' s article on "The Spoken Word"_c omes in because that is.. .he uses that word laleo in here, which I teach in Corinthians when I teach the Foundational Class. And he says the word is employed 24 times in I Corinthians chapter 14. I had forgotten that.

This word is truly significant. I couldn' t quite understand it Research Department, what  you said on page 26B 16, where you defined it ' to make vocal utterance,' ' to babble,' 'to talk,'  'to  exercise the faculty of speech without reference to the words spoken.' I just wondered if there might not be another word that could be substituted or utilized at this point. I know that Zachariah 8:16 is the quotation that is used here, or spoken of. And that Zachariah 8:16 adds force to what is said by using a quote, a quotation. That' s why my question to the Research Department is, How can it be without reference to what is spoken if it is truth plus the quotation of the Word of God that's given. It doesn't quite fit for me.

'With his neighbor' has to be a believing neighbor. This 'speak truth with his neighbor' is a figure of speech gnome, g-n-o-m-e, which simply is a citation. And that' s a citation from Zachariah 8:16.

There are a series of figures of speech, Corps, in chapter four which just put the 00mph, the highlight, to the particular things that are set whereby you put off the old man. This phrase here 'speak every man truth with his neighbor'  is one of them. The other one appears in verse 26, 'be  angry and sin not.' ' Steal no more' is another one. 'Corrupt communication' is the fourth one.  'Grieve not the  holy spirit' is the fifth one. ' All bitterness, wrath, anger, clamor, evil speaking' is  the sixth. And  then  ' be kind' and so forth, is the seventh.

You see, the last phrase in that verse, in King James, For we' re members one of what? [Another] And it' s relative to the neighbor. Now you just look at that. Wherefore put away  lying, speak  every  man truth with his what? [Neighbor] For we are members  one of  another.  That  doesn't  mean just  a neighbor who lives next door, but it has to be a believing neighbor because  we are members  one of what? [Another]. You could not be a member ' one of another' ifhe  was an  unbeliever.  That's how I know this is going to  work. This tells me that the neighbor  is  a  believer.  And  this  ' we' re members one of another' continues the imagery of the Body of Christ.

The literal  according  to  usage of this verse is as follows:   Wherefore  put away the  lie... and I believe in my heart, before I go on with the literal that until man is born again, it's all a lie anyways. And that' s why I believe that this translation will fit in the light of that knowledge. Because when  a man is not born again, his whole  life is just a  lie. Now you're  born again,  and that ' s  why  I think the text states it ' wherefore put away the lie,' the life you' ve been living , the screwed up life you have lived outside of God. It' s been just a life of a lie. It' s not truth. It' s just the opposite of truth and that's my reason for translating it this way... Wherefore put away the lie.

You've got to go with that translation. You have no other text to go by both from Aramaic and Greek it's 'lie.' Not 'lying.' If the Research Department has anything to share in the light of that, I'd be blessed to hear, but you' ve heard my reasons for translating it, Research Department, this way.

Now since they're born again, their whole life is changed, so the life of lying, and living a lie, and being a lie, and being false, is to be put away.

And every man... this is the translation ... and everyone, everyone. The word ' man' you could use because it's an inclusive noun, but I prefer to use the word ' one.'

Wherefore put away the lie and everyone speak the truth with his neighbor for we are members one of another. That is literal according to usage.

Now for the expanded according to understanding. It's not bad. Because of this... What we coughing for? Everybody sick?...Because of this... and the reason I went in the expanded along this line is because verse 24 last week told us that we are created by God in righteousness and in true purity, through holiness. Twenty four.

That's why 25, Wherefore ... 'wherefore' can be translated 'because of this.' Because of this what? Being created in righteousness and truly pure. See it's an inside job.

Because of this being created in righteousness and truly pure by the grace and the love of

God.. .Because of this being created in righteousness and truly pure, you put away, completely lay to rest the lie that you have been and were living and each one of you speak the truth using a quotation from the Word with his believing neighbor for we are members one of another in the Body of the Church.

Robinson {Edward} said, he translated, 'speak every man truth with his neighbor' and he said it's from Zachariah 8:16 which adds force to what is said by using a quote. That's why I translated that. I think that' s great. It adds force to what is said. If you're speaking to someone, it adds force to what you say by using a quote, a quotation from God's Word. In other words, ' you share the Word with them.' That' s why I went with that translation. I want to give it to you again in this sense.

Speak the truth using a quotation from the Word, which means 'share the Word.' Quote the Word to them. Tell them what the Word says, with his believing neighbor. Why? For we are members one of another in the Body of the Church. This verse is just mind blowing.

Here, you have a born-again believer neighbor who needs to grow up a little more. So what do you do? Each one speak the truth to that neighbor, that believer, using the Word, quoting the Word because we' re members one of another in the Body of the Church. It's a real positive thing to do.

Verse 26 in King James reads, Be angry.. .ha ha... we like that one, don't we. Be ye angry and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath.

Here is a verse of Scripture that' s very, very difficult for most people. And it' s not too easy for us either. But I think we are able to share the truth of the greatness of this and it's been burning in my heart for a long time to do this with our people.

Everybody has problems with ' how can you be angry and not sin?' You know, how can raise hell with something and not be sinful in doing it? Teed off and not be sinful. And how can you go... and what does it mean 'don't let the sun go down upon your wrath?' See.

In the context, here, verses 26 and 27 deal with your believing neighbor, specifically. Then the Greek word for ' anger' which is from the root orge, o-r-g-long-e means 'anger together with the desire of revenge .' That' s bad. That' s a heavy. The Hebrew word means ' to kill, and all the tumults of passion that terminate in killing.' So it's a real heavy word when it said ' be angry.'

And the way I believe it's used in God' s Word, ' be ye angry' means ' it's a long time anger with your believing neighbor until a change has ensued.' The desire to... of revenge is a change. And I, knowing the Word in the light of the new birth, it's where a change finally comes about. Until that time, you just, long-term, you just stay put witnessing the Word, sharing the Word. You do not dislike the believing neighbor; you simply dislike that he is not fully accepting the Word and walking on it. So it' s a long-term anger until a change has ensued. You just stay faithful.

I don't know what else to do with those words. It is a righteous anger. Yet it is a righteous anger without sin.

Among the scholars, there is a disagreement on these words. Well, I don't know about my being a scholar; that I don' t anything about being about. But it's simple to me because righteous anger is commanded by God's Word when it says ' be ye angry.' Well, the scholars can fight about it. I don' t care. It' s a command. Not just permitted to get teed once in a while when somebody' s off of God' s Word, a believer is off of God's Word. You' re always teed off righteously at any believer, born-again believer, who is off of God' s Word. And for those of us in the Way Ministry, it' s been a lifetime.

Get into it with them on... Oh what subject do you want to talk about? Baptism? Food? One God? See. All that stuff.

The Aramaic is accurate in the words ' and sin not.' It literally translates ' and you will not sin.' Again, this ' be angry and sin not' is that figure gnome. Quotation. A citation from the Old Testament. It' s from Psalm 4:4. But in King James, Psalm 4:4, it's translated 'stand in awe.' The real sense of the Hebrew is ' one of admonition;' sin not. Where we' re admonished to not sin. Sin not.

' Let not the sun go down on your wrath. ' Ha ha. That again is beautiful. People went to bed when the sun went down, when it got dark. That's when they went to bed. So what that simply is saying, ha ha, ' don't go to bed teed off.' Don' t let the sun go down on your wrath. In other words, go to bed; don' t go to bed mad. ' When you go to bed' is what it means. Let not the sun go down when you go to bed. And they went to bed when the sun went down. When it got dark, they went to bed, see.

' Upon your wrath.' And the word ' wrath' here is basically ' irritation.' Ha ha. Previously when I taught Ephesians, I made mention of this fact, ' don' t let righteous anger shake you, wondering if it was right on. When you go to bed, go to sleep.'

Now, this is what we have done with it in the literal, ha ha, according to usage. I got more papers up here than Carter has liver pills, or something. Then, I can' t find my... whatever it is I take off of it.

Okay, verse 26. You be righteously angry.. .this is literal according to usage.. .and you will not be sinning. Don't go to bed even with a momentary irritation, ha ha.

I don't think you get nearly as much fun out of this as I do. It's neat. It's absolutely scrumptious, see. At the opening, is that heavy word, remember? Anger. So it's a real heavy time. So what he is saying, in the heavy time, when your standing on God' s Word  and sharing that with the  believing  neighbor, you' re righteously angry... you're not sinning. And  you don't  even go to  bed with a momentary irritation. In other Words, when you go to bed, thank God the day is over. Say your last prayer and start snoring.

Boy, that would save a lot of sleeping pills, wouldn' t it? Practicing that principle. Boy, oh boy, what a tremendous Word. And hardly anybody understands verse 26. They argue about it, but they don' t get the understanding.

Now this is the expanded one according to understanding, I hope. And again, I would like to just lay some things before the Corps, and especially before the Research Department. I translated the first part of verse 26, You always stay angry with an all-out desire to have them to change which anger will not be sin on your part.

Then I have another translation of that first part of it: You be righteously angry, 'teed off' with sin... 'Teed off' I put in quotes. But don't  you sin  by acting  ' holier than thou'  vaunting  yourself  by acting so righteously like you never sin.

I do not know which one of those two the Research Department feels would be the better. The last part of the phrase that I translated which would go with both of these that I have given you here on the expanded one for understanding. This, the last part, goes with that first one and with the second ... also.. .even if it is only a momentary irritation.  When you go to  bed, go to sleep. That's what I did with it.

Now, verse 27. King James says, Neither (or neither) give place to the Devil. The word 'place' is simply a portion, a part. No believer will give full place to the Devil, but he may be giving a part, a portion. He' ll mark off a spot, ' this is Devil' s permission over here, over here, no permission, you know. And you really give the Devil a portion or a spot if you stew about it after you go to bed and you toss and you tum and can' t sleep.

This word 'the Devil,' ' the Devil' in the Aramaic is a very interesting and exciting Word to me and it blesses my heart. It' s a compound word where the first part means ' to eat' or ' to devour.' The latter

' to slander' or ' to accuse. '  So when I got to translating  this, literally according  to usage, verse 27 reads: Do not give any portion or space or an opportunity to the Devil. So I used those three words synonymously: portion, space, opportunity. Do not give any portion or space or an opportunity to the Devil.

The expanded according to understanding: And you will not give a toehold, an opportunity or an occasion for the Devil to eat you. Ha ha. I get more fun than you ever will out of working this stuff, huh.

You see, and to me, that communicates to my understanding. John 10:10. The thief cometh not but for to what? [Steal, kill, and destroy] Right. To eat you out. To beat you. And that's why that Aramaic word, on the word ' Devil' really thrilled me.

And that ' s why I put it into the expanded translation: And you will not give a ' toehold.' Now, at L.E.A.D., you know how important it is to get a what? [Toehold] Ha ha. And when you' re really climbing in, you' re blessed for a toehold. How thankful you are when you get a foothold. Now the adversary can never get a foothold in a believer' s life until he first has a toehold. That's why I translated it that way.

Do not give... and you will not give a toehold ... shave all the rocks off... an opportunity or an occasion for the Devil to eat you. And that' s exactly what he likes to do to believers.

Now we go to verse 28. King James says, Let him that stole steal not more: but rather let him labor, working with his hands the thing which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth. And here again, is another great work that I believe should be in our research journal GMIR, Walter' s work on " Workers for God."

It' s just tremendous where he... you know... he just goes into God' s men are called many things in the Word. They' re called: fellow workers, ministers, or servants, slaves, fellow slaves, partners, messengers, soldiers, fellow soldiers, athletes, fellow athletes, stewards, ambassadors, witnesses, all of those. And he covers them so beautifully. And I love very much how he covered the word ' slave,' because it' s a much stronger word than to be a minister, or to be a servant. It is to be one who is branded, marked out, sold out. And baby, from that day on, there are no ifs, and' s, or but' s. You never budge on it. You are branded. Most believers are never branded. They may be servants, they may be ministers, but they are not branded. When you' re branded, you stay faithful. You do not budge. You do not change. You stay put. If all hell breaks loose, you still live the believing Word.

I think the prophet once said, If I was in the midst of hell, God I know you' d be there. (Psalm 139:8) He' d be there. That' s the doulos. That, of course, is just a tremendous piece of work.

And the other great part that I think... and this is a second piece that I want the Corps to master before next Wednesday night, " Workers for God," the work on ' witness.' You see, it's the same word basically that's translated ' martyr,' see. And we got a lot of those canonized. That's not at all what a witness is. A witness is a living example, not a dead one. The word 'martyr' simply means that you lay down your life in witnessing. And boy, when you put the doulos together with ' witness,' then you' ve got power for abundant living. It's just a fantastic work by Walter and I' m real grateful that it was published. Because once it' s in print, people can take a look at it if they want to.

I'd like a cup of coffee, please.

Now, we are in verse 28. The Aramaic translation is ' and he who was stealing.' I understand it from the English, ' let him that stole,' past tense. The Aramaic is real simple, real strong. ' And he, the one who is born again, who was, past tense, stealing.'

Thank you.

His whole life was one of those before he was born again.

Whenever you bring a cup of coffee to a right-hand man, you put the handle to the right. When you serve a cup of coffee to a left-hand man, you put it on the left-hand side and put the handle to the left. Corps principle number seven or something, ha ha. Mrs. Wierwille would say, Well, be thankful you even get a cup of coffee. [Laughter] Ah, you're wonderful.

See, ' let him who stole, steal no more.' 'Stole and steal,' that' s a figure of speech and is polyptoton p-o-l-y-p-t-o-t-o-n. It' s a repetition of the same root word in different parts of speech or reflections. But, that's not earth shaking right now in my heart.

You see, in some Eastern culture, it was not considered a sin or a shame to steal because that's the way they lived, the only way they lived. Somebody told me... or not only told me, one of our people, but it was in a national magazine, that the basic culture of Russia today is to steal. And in some respects I can understand this. If you don't have anything and you're starving to death and there' s a loaf of bread you can get a hold of... steal the dam thing. I understand that.

So this verse is really sharp, really sharp. Let him who stole, even though that man previously considered it the way to live and there was no shame in it, no sin in it. He said, Well, let that fellow who stole, steal no more. Something has happened on the inside of that man. Something that happened, where He is able to meet all of our need according to His riches in glory. Christ in you, the hope of glory. More than conquerors.

A record in the Old Testament, I forget where it is, but it's in there, that it' s never, you never need to borrow or steal bread or... what is that in the Old Testament? Begging bread. One person stand and tell me. {Psalm 37:25, I have been young and now am old; yet have I seen the righteous forsaken, nor His seed begging bread.} Psalm 27:25 who? {Psalm 37:25} 37:25. All the years, he's never seen the righteous to have to do what? {Beg bread} Beg bread.

First of all, I wish the Christian world could hear this. Secondly, I wish our government in the United States could understand it. The Word says, If you don't work, you don' t eat. A lot of that stuff. Well, what we've been doing is stealing from the people who are willing to work to give to the people who don' t want to work. That's a bunch of crap. That's stealing. That's why this verse is so hot in my soul tonight. Let him who stole, quit stealing, dang it. See.

Many years ago I was really knocked for a loop along some of this line in India, from Dr. Williams. I think he loved India maybe like I love the United States, I don' t know. Because only a man knows how much he loves his own country, I guess.

But... as we were traveling together, he said to me, Dr. Wierwille, I hear you have whores in the United States.

You know, I never had given it a thought. I just took it for granted. [Laughter] And I said, yeah. He said, Why does a rich country like the United States have whores?

And I said, I don't know.

And he said, I can't understand it. Cannot your women make enough money to live? Yeah, but they figure that' s cheaper and more pleasurable or something, I don' t know. And he said, Well, I think it's sinful that the United States has whores.

And I said, What do you mean?

And he said to me, why, I can understand India. He said we don' t enough food, we don' t have enough of anything hardly for a lot of people. And we have whores because that' s the only way they can continue to live physically.

And I thought to myself, well boy, that' s slapping me in the face good. And I took it as a wonderful lesson. There is no excuse in the United States for any women being a whore because she doesn' t need to get screwed and paid for it in order to get money so she can live. There's plenty of work available and if there isn' t she ought to get born again, then there' s a guarantee of work. ..other work, available. I tell you, when you' re honest, some of these men in other countries have some real logic behind their thinking. How would you have liked to have handled that? I just simply admitted, Well, I think we' re wrong in the United States. But I said, I think you' re wrong in India, too, because no reason to have whores here if you get them born again.

So I don' t know. But this verse today as I worked the final working on this verse 28 is when my heart really went back and burned with that truth that Dr. Williams had stated. Because in many Eastern cultures, it was not considered as sin or as shame to steal, if it was a matter of livelihood. You sometimes wonder who will live in the greatest condemnation before God and justice and judgment when the time comes.

For in most of what are called poor countries even, there is sufficient money, food, and other things for the people to live if those in positions of authority were not so selfish and egotistical, and want it for themselves , and let the rest of the world die... or a country die.

The word ' labor' in verse 28 is the word which literally means ' hard work resulting in fatigue.' That's how I felt coming from the woods last night. And I didn' t do anything. It was just hard work being there with the rest of you. Today I got so tired of being with some, I came home. Ah, you' re wonderful.

' Working with his hands' is an Eastern cultural type of thing. Today in our culture, you could have it, you know, the truth is working with your mind or working with your hand, whatever you' re working at. But in Eastern culture, every son was to be trained to work with his hands, even if he was the son of a king. Had to learn a trade, a profession of business.

Jesus Christ was a saddle maker. He made them to ride, I guess, what do you want? Tennessee Walkers , or? See. I think not only did he do that, Paul did it, too, you know. Someday I'm going to find a...or Walter, or some of those, are going to find me a manuscript to prove it. .. and a wonderful carpenter by trade. Many times doing carpentry work and being a saddle maker were sort of in the same household, because building carpentry and having saddles to use for their business and carrying on, were very, very closely aligned. Well, I won' t argue the point, but I wish we' d keep looking.

II Thessalonians.. .Do your hands ever get so dry you can hardly hold anything? Golly, mine are so dry tonight, I wonder why? II Thessalonians, chapter 3:10... this we commanded you that if any would not work, neither should he what? [Eat] Right. Even unemployment is no excuse for stealing. He just doesn' t eat. Goes and gets work. Boy, when I first saw the greatness of these principles many years ago, and then of course, I uniquely by God' s grace, inculcated that into our W.O.W. program and very dynamically in the Corps leadership.

Acts 1:4, 6 & 12-26
October 14, 1975
Acts 1:4
“and being assembled together with them” – some center margins have ‘eating together’. One of the
reasons I was so interested in this is I think he did the covenant of salt with them just before they left.
Remember he had said, “If I go away I’ll prepare a place for you and I will come back.” (Reference:
John 14:2-3) I think all these things he sealed with the covenant of salt. The Nestorian, the Jacobite,
the Murdock, the Estrangelo; they all read, “and when he ate bread with them.” You wonder how I
get the covenant of salt out of that. In the eating together with, the covenant of salt was used many
times. In the Old Testament you’d make an agreement with a man, and then instead of having an
attorney there to draw up the papers, you just sit down and eat together. The food would have salt in
it and that’s where the covenant of salt came in. “Eateth with me”, Jesus said, “shall lift his heel
against me.” (Reference: John 13:18) Remember that one about Judas? I believe Judas had taken the
covenant of salt and broke it and that’s why he committed suicide. If you and had taken the covenant
of salt and I broke it, you would have the right to see that I was executed but Judas just did it to
himself because he broke the covenant. In Oriental culture, not just biblically, but it was true in just
plain common people, whenever they made a deal, when they worked out some arrangement on some
business transaction, they’d just sit down and eat together. Sometimes they wouldn’t ever eat, they’d
just have a glass of buttermilk together and that had salt in it. The covenant was much greater than
the covenant of blood in the Bible; much greater in usage. I can understand this because in the pagan
field, blood letting for their god was common even to become so possessed and so fanatical in their
following of devil spirits that they’d cut their own throat and fall down with their throat sliced at the
alter at the foot of the god. You never read about a covenant of salt to devil spirits in the Word. You
do read about the blood covenant that they kept for their god.
Acts 1:6
“When they therefore were come together” – from the Nestorian, Jacobite and Estrangelo
manuscripts available to us, it literally reads, “Yet while they gathered together. All of this occurred
at that meal when they were eating together. I would call this ‘the last supper’. When do you think he
went up? Here they ate together. I do not believe it was breakfast. I do not believe it was the noon
meal. I believe it was the evening meal and they did it just before sunset and I think the ascension
was just then. I can’t prove it but it’s interesting. This would be at the close of a day, just before the
beginning of a new day because the beginning of a new day was Pentecost, with the coming of the
spirit bright and early. Jesus Christ said, when he died, said “It is finished”, but something was not
finished yet because he still spent forty days. Something still was not finished because, eight days
afterward, Pentecost. What I see in here is the ascension at the close of the day, taken up, and then
the coming of the spirit on the day of Pentecost at the first hour of prayer.
Acts 1:12
“mount called Olivet” – I believe this is the only place it’s translated ‘mount called Olivet’. It
basically is the Mount of Olives at other places. The old Estrangelo Aramaic reads, ‘the mount that
was called an olive garden’.
“a sabbath day’s journey” – A sabbath day’s journey as best we know was 6,164 feet. It’s 1.16745
miles.
Joshua 3:2-4 - They were to keep two thousand cubits between them and the ark of the covenant.
I’ve often wondered if that is where they got the idea of a sabbath day’s journey, the distance. One
38
time in the Old Testament, the ark had been stolen and they went to bring it back and it sort of
teetered and tottered on the wagon and I believe four men ran up to it to hold it so it wouldn’t topple
off of the wagon and all four died like that. There are a lot of interesting things like this that I retain
in my mind. I don’t know where to look for the answers. Maybe sometime we’ll run across it in some
piece of literature. These are things in the Word – Why? Because, I think spiritually God’s Word has
to have great respect. The Bible is not a book like any other book. It’s not like Shakespeare or Plato
and we are not to handle the Word of God deceitfully. I believe that you have to have that kind of
respect for the Word.
Acts 1:13
You can’t ever drive too deeply in your mind, the literal action on the Word of God – the literal
action on the Word of God – just literally doing it.
“Peter and James …” – It lists eleven. The only name missing is Judas Iscariot and that again I think
is the second great proof that he had just left their company previously. First of all in verse 11, “men
of Galilee”, here in verse 13, the listing of the eleven excluding Judas Iscariot.
Acts 1:14
“one accord” – I believe this is the first time that the word, one accord appears in Acts. It’s used a
number of times in the first several chapters of Acts.
“supplication” – One of the old texts uses ‘thanksgiving’. Many of the texts delete the word
‘supplication’.
“with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with his brethren” – This has been a great
scripture of truth for us because verse 13 told us that the upper room was a place where these men
abode. That’s where they slept. No woman would be allowed in the sleeping quarters of men. No
man would be allowed in the sleeping quarters of women. Where they ‘continued with one accord’
could not have been in the upper room. It could have been in the Temple area. It could have been
some other place too, but not in the upper room.
Judges 4:15-22 – In verse 18, ‘turn in to me’ does not mean sexual relationship like the
concordances talk about. This is an oriental cultural thing. There is peace between these two rulers. It
says ‘houses’ that means whatever they’re over. There’s peace there and she being the queen, and the
king is gone therefore she has to take the initiative. Sisera can’t run up to her and say, “Honey can I
move in with you?” The culture wouldn’t allow that.
But for her to take the initiative and come out to meet him and say to him, “Turn in unto me and fear
not” is right on. It has nothing to do with anything but the culture. In verse 18 it says ‘she covered
him with a mantle’. That’s the second great truth. She covered him with that mantle to indicate that
she would protect him from the enemy at all cost because her husband, the king and the king who
was the head of Sisera were buddy-buddies. Their houses were at peace and they were working
together. He asked her for water. She didn’t give him water. She gave him buttermilk, the covenant
of salt. Firstly, she asks him to come in. Secondly she puts the mantle over him. Thirdly she gives the
covenant of salt to him. He’s scared to death. Barak is following, right? The man’s life is at stake.
She is doing everything in her culture and background to make him realize that she will protect his
life and die for him before anybody else will touch him. If someone kills the queen, Barak’s going to
have a little problem because the other king’s going to get to fighting. He told her to stand in the door
of the tent. Look at the unbelief in that man’s mind. He knew that if she stood at the door of the tent,
no man would pass by her into the tent because she was the queen and if anyone would shove to the
side, then there’d be another war. The ‘nail’ in verse 21 means a stake. The concordances label Jael
as a liar, deceitful, a murderer, all that stuff. They just don’t understand Oriental culture. Sisera had
broken the covenant with her and when you break the covenant you die. “Her” in verse 22 is the key.
The tents were divided into rooms. No man but her husband would be allowed in her sleeping
quarters – “her”. Sisera knew that if he could get on her side of the tent, nobody would be allowed
there to find him. That’s why she put the stake through his head. He had broken every covenant.
The upper room was where they abode so no woman would be allowed in there.
“one accord” – means unity of purpose. Like tonight we’re of one accord, Unity of purpose. The
purpose is a work on the book of Acts together, studying the book of Acts. ‘One accord’ does not
mean that we all have the same renewed mind perception. Why I hit this is that later, on the day of
Pentecost, they were of one accord and the teaching is that until you all spiritually get to that same
level you never receive the fullness of the holy spirit to speak in tongues or as they put it “He will
never posses you so you can speak in tongues.
“in prayer” – it does say they were praying all the time but during that period of time between the
ascension and the day of Pentecost, sometime in there they must have been in one accord in prayer.
Luke 24:52-53 - It doesn’t say they were continuously in the temple, they were continually. That
means sporadically. They were in the temple when they were supposed to be, or when they should be
or could be. For those deeply committed spiritual souls there were five hours of prayer; the first, the
third, the sixth, the ninth and the twelfth. The first corresponds to our 6 am, the third to 9 am, the
sixth to 12 noon, the ninth to 3 pm, the twelfth to 6 pm. In Acts the “one accord, in prayer” I believe
fits into the pattern of the hours of prayer and therefore they met at the place where women were
allowed to meet with men and that would be in the temple area. It’s interesting Mary the mother of
Jesus was there and his brethren.
Acts 1:15
“in those days” – between the ascension and Pentecost while they were tarrying in Jerusalem
“disciples” – many of the texts read ‘brethren’
“number” – is translated in some texts ‘crowd’
“about an hundred and twenty” – This is a goodly number when you consider the crucifixion, when
you consider everything that occurred in Jerusalem and this number included all men. The women
were in addition to this because the women were never numbered. When they counted the children of
Israel, for instance, just the men were counted then it says plus women and children. If the proportion
was then what it is now it would be about five women to one man. It’s not the day of Pentecost.
Everybody teaches that the holy spirit on the day of Pentecost came to people in the upper room and
there were 120 present. “About” 120 is not 120. The upper room is where they slept.
Acts 1:16
“the Holy Ghost by the mouth of David spake” – Who’s mouth? – David’s. Who’s vocabulary? –
David’s. But it is God’s Word.
“took” – ‘arrested’ is the text.
Acts 1:17
“with” – or ‘among’
“had” - omit
“obtained part of this ministry” – Had he believed God he could have gone back to Jerusalem and if
he had have been at the same place the other eleven are going to be, he would have received. That’s
why he only received part of the ministry.
Acts 1:18-19
Verses 18 and 19 are a parenthesis. I t is not a parenthesis in your Bible but it’s a parenthesis
according to the truth of God’s Word because a parenthesis is a legitimate insertion by way of
explanation which adds nothing to the truth only it elucidates it, it clarifies it, it magnifies, it adds
oomph to the truth that’s stated in a deeper exploratory way. You could read on from the end of verse
17 directly to the beginning of verse 20.
Acts 1:20
“bishoprick” – or ‘overseer’s responsibility’ This is simply an office position. In Roman Catholicism
the Pope is a priest. That’s the highest office in Roman Catholicism. The Arch Bishop is a priest. The
Cardinal is a priest. The highest you can go is to be a priest. The rest are offices of responsibility.
That’s all. ‘Bishop’ is Greek. In the Hebrew in the Old Testament it is ‘elder’.
“take” – lambano
“his habitation” – his responsibility, his place of life, his life
Acts 1:18
“purchased” – means provided for himself. He bought it. This same word translated ‘purchased’ is
translated ‘provided in Matthew 10:9.
“field” – chorion – property
“reward of iniquity” – This has been interpreted by Bible scholars and teachers as the 30 pieces of
silver that Judas was paid by the religious echelon for betraying the Lord Jesus Christ to them. This
cannot be true as we shall see from Matthew. It could have been 30 pieces of silver because the
‘reward’ is the ‘wages’ of sin or wrong doing. It is possible that this money could have come from
John 12:6. Judas had great natural ability. Jesus made him treasurer of the organization of the twelve
apostles and Jesus Christ is not stupid. When it came to real spiritual depth Judas was not in that
inner circle. When it came to real spiritual depth, Jesus took with him Peter and James and John. The
jealousy tendency was there. At one point they were arguing about who was going to be greatest in
the kingdom. Jesus Christ loved all twelve apostles. He didn’t love Peter or James or John any more
than he loved the rest. I do not believe Jesus Christ played favorites. I do not believe that any man of
God has a right to play favorites or should play favorites. Don’t let the old devil get you hooked up
on that stuff; “I like him but I don’t like her.” Or “I like her but I don’t like him.” If they’re born
again of God’s spirit then you treat them like it. Yet there will be times when you have to take “Peter
and James and John.” There shouldn’t be any jealousy, any bitterness or any resentment. The wages
of iniquity have to be the money he stole out of the purse. None of the other apostles bought any
property. He bought the property with stolen money. That’s why it’s called the reward of iniquity.
“in the midst” – is deleted
“all” – is deleted
“his bowels gushed out” – Hanging was like impaling yourself on a sharp instrument like a sword or
a piece of wood that had been sharpened like a spear. That’s why his bowels gushed out.
Acts 1:19
“all the dwellers” – has to be all without distinction. I often wonder who the all includes. It was
probably front page news. It brings disgrace upon Jesus Christ.
“field is called in their proper tongue, Aceldama” – ‘proper tongue’-own tongue or in the vernacular
Matthew 27:3-8 - The thirty pieces of silver that he had received for betraying the Lord Jesus
Christ, Judas brings back after the betrayal to the chief priests and elders. If he’s going to bring these
thirty pieces of silver back then he can’t use those thirty pieces of silver to buy his own property. The
reward of iniquity of Acts 1 cannot be the thirty pieces of silver. Thirty pieces of silver is the lowest
amount that you were allowed to pay for a slave. That’s all Judas got for the Lord Jesus Christ. One
would think he could have negotiated a greater price than that. When the chief priests and elders
wanted Judas’ help and they wanted to solicit his cooperation, then he was a good guy. When it was
all over with and he felt badly about it, he knew he had betrayed the innocent blood.
He wanted to give back the thirty pieces of silver and the fellows said, ‘stick it, man’ – “What’s it to
us? You take care of it.” He could not have killed himself at this time because this is shortly after the
betrayal. In Acts we know he was still there on the day of the ascension. So, whatever it means in
verse 5 ‘hanged himself’ could not mean that he died at that time. In verse 6 the chief priests said ‘it
was unlawful to put the thirty pieces of silver into the treasury because it is the price of blood’. There
was nothing unlawful about negotiating for somebody’s life whom you want to crucify and give the
‘old Mafia treatment’ to. Nothing unlawful about that, but to take the money back, that was unlawful.
What a bunch of cop-outs and these are the top religious leaders. Look at the irony of that. In verse 7
the word ‘bought’ as it’s used in the text means ‘to make a deliberate decision to go to the public
market place where things are sold. The Greek word for ‘field’ here is agros, not ‘property as in
Acts. They deliberately bought a ‘potter’s field’ to bury ‘strangers’ or ‘foreigners’, people who are
not of the same religious persuasion as you. They bury them in potter’s fields. If you were too poor to
be buried anyplace, this is a place where you could be buried. Many cemeteries today still have a
potter’s field. In verse 8 it was called ‘The field (agros) of blood (hemetos)’. Not then but later on
when they found out what happened to the thirty pieces of silver.
When you allow Matthew to speak for itself and allow Acts to speak for itself, there is no
contradiction. This takes all the confusion out and allows the Word to fit like a hand in a glove.
Acts 1:1-21-25
Vs. 23
“appointed” – one text reads made to stand. Another text reads nominated.
Vs. 24
“whether” – ‘if either’
Vs. 25
“take” – lambano
“by transgression fell” – literally – transgressed.
“his own place” – it does not say ‘hell’. It says ‘own place’ Why everybody wants him to go to hell, I
don’t know. Verse18 says he, falling headlong burst asunder at a field he had purchased with ‘the
reward of iniquity’ – ‘his own place’.
Acts 1:26
“lots” – vote – ballot
“lot” – vote – ballot
“fell upon” – was for
“he was numbered with the eleven apostles” – eleven plus one make twelve and it’s still not the day
of Pentecost. I would like to believe it was the night before the fullness, but I cannot say. The reason
I like to think in terms of this is because this is the last thing that’s recorded happening before the day
of Pentecost fully came; the replacement of Judas by Matthias. The next record is the record of the
day of Pentecost.