Search Eternally Blessed Archive

Search by passage (e.g., John 3:16), keyword (e.g., Jesus, prophet, etc.) or topic (e.g., salvation)

Acts 11:1-18 - Corps Notes - May 4, 1976

3rdburglar by Wordburglar
Format: mp3,pdf
Publication Date: 5-04-1976

On Ephesians 4:25 where I want to begin tonight, or where we will begin tonight , the first part of what the Research Team gave me is the work that Walter Cummins published in our wonderful Way Magazine on "The Spoken Word." Also, as we cover Ephesians 4:28 tonight, I had all the information in front of me from another article that Walter Cummins has in the... has had in the Magazine. The first article on Ephesians 4:25 is entitled "The Spoken Word." The one on Ephesians 4:28 is "Workers for God." Both of these pieces of work by Walter are absolutely superb. And I believe that they should appear and will appear in our research journal GMIR whenever we begin publishing that. {GMIR Aramaic word meaning ' to perfect, accomplish , mature, complete, arithmetically to be divisible without any remainder.}

And I noticed again that some of the things that were stated are just so beautifully and logically presented, I'm truly thankful for, not only Walter, but the whole Research Department. I think our Biblical Research Department is just second to none. And it' s even going to be better by God' s mercy and grace next year and in years to come than it is at this time. And right now I do not believe that our Biblical Research Department needs to take a back seat for any academic institution or work in the world.

And I thought today, I have never... I've never thought of Walter Cummins in any other capacity than to be my assistant. I know Vince Finnegan, you know, on the books is my assistant. And that' s great. But I've never thought of Walter Cummins in any other capacity for so many years as always being my assistant. And I think he' s just the most wonderful person that any president could have as his assistant. And also to be chairmen of the Department of Greek, and then the coordinator of the Biblical research of The Way International. For any one man to have that position and that responsibility is an awesome reality and I'm real proud of Walter and real thankful for him. But I am also thankful for the rest of our wonderful men and women in the Research Department.

I would like for the Corps all over the country to go to the Magazine and find "The Spoken_Word," that's the title of it, dealing with Ephesians 4:25 and other scriptures, and before the next Corps meeting next week, you endeavor to master that great piece of work by Walter Cummins. It's just, you know, the spoken Word. Over fifty Greek words are used in the New Testament in connection with the faculties of utterance. Over fifty. And then he takes the most important ones and he lists them and it' s just. .. it' s just a piece of research work that you should really as a Corps master in your heart and in your life.

Ephesians 4:25 in the King James reads, Wherefore put away lyin g, speak every man truth with his neighbor: for we are members one of another.

The ' putting away' was interesting to me again because of the Greek word aniko, a-n-i-k-o.

And this word is ' the putting away,' this word ' put away,' aniko, is the same root word as in 4:22, where we use the word ' rest,' meaning ' to rest.' Is that right? Yep, that is right. I taught you that,

didn't I? Did I or didn't I? Doesn't look right to me. It is the same root. What chapter am I missing? Am I missing anything? I don't know. Right now I'm screwed up, ha ha. First time today. You check the word again and I'll do that, too and see what I'm missing here.

But a-n-i-k-o is the word for ' putting away from you. ' To put away. And it' s the same root as the word ' rest.' I don't know where the word appears, but it's got to be in there.

Now, that word ' speak,' every man speak. That word ' speak ' is from the Greek word

laleo, l-a-l-e-long-o. And that' s where Walter' s article on "The Spoken Word"_c omes in because that is.. .he uses that word laleo in here, which I teach in Corinthians when I teach the Foundational Class. And he says the word is employed 24 times in I Corinthians chapter 14. I had forgotten that.

This word is truly significant. I couldn' t quite understand it Research Department, what  you said on page 26B 16, where you defined it ' to make vocal utterance,' ' to babble,' 'to talk,'  'to  exercise the faculty of speech without reference to the words spoken.' I just wondered if there might not be another word that could be substituted or utilized at this point. I know that Zachariah 8:16 is the quotation that is used here, or spoken of. And that Zachariah 8:16 adds force to what is said by using a quote, a quotation. That' s why my question to the Research Department is, How can it be without reference to what is spoken if it is truth plus the quotation of the Word of God that's given. It doesn't quite fit for me.

'With his neighbor' has to be a believing neighbor. This 'speak truth with his neighbor' is a figure of speech gnome, g-n-o-m-e, which simply is a citation. And that' s a citation from Zachariah 8:16.

There are a series of figures of speech, Corps, in chapter four which just put the 00mph, the highlight, to the particular things that are set whereby you put off the old man. This phrase here 'speak every man truth with his neighbor'  is one of them. The other one appears in verse 26, 'be  angry and sin not.' ' Steal no more' is another one. 'Corrupt communication' is the fourth one.  'Grieve not the  holy spirit' is the fifth one. ' All bitterness, wrath, anger, clamor, evil speaking' is  the sixth. And  then  ' be kind' and so forth, is the seventh.

You see, the last phrase in that verse, in King James, For we' re members one of what? [Another] And it' s relative to the neighbor. Now you just look at that. Wherefore put away  lying, speak  every  man truth with his what? [Neighbor] For we are members  one of  another.  That  doesn't  mean just  a neighbor who lives next door, but it has to be a believing neighbor because  we are members  one of what? [Another]. You could not be a member ' one of another' ifhe  was an  unbeliever.  That's how I know this is going to  work. This tells me that the neighbor  is  a  believer.  And  this  ' we' re members one of another' continues the imagery of the Body of Christ.

The literal  according  to  usage of this verse is as follows:   Wherefore  put away the  lie... and I believe in my heart, before I go on with the literal that until man is born again, it's all a lie anyways. And that' s why I believe that this translation will fit in the light of that knowledge. Because when  a man is not born again, his whole  life is just a  lie. Now you're  born again,  and that ' s  why  I think the text states it ' wherefore put away the lie,' the life you' ve been living , the screwed up life you have lived outside of God. It' s been just a life of a lie. It' s not truth. It' s just the opposite of truth and that's my reason for translating it this way... Wherefore put away the lie.

You've got to go with that translation. You have no other text to go by both from Aramaic and Greek it's 'lie.' Not 'lying.' If the Research Department has anything to share in the light of that, I'd be blessed to hear, but you' ve heard my reasons for translating it, Research Department, this way.

Now since they're born again, their whole life is changed, so the life of lying, and living a lie, and being a lie, and being false, is to be put away.

And every man... this is the translation ... and everyone, everyone. The word ' man' you could use because it's an inclusive noun, but I prefer to use the word ' one.'

Wherefore put away the lie and everyone speak the truth with his neighbor for we are members one of another. That is literal according to usage.

Now for the expanded according to understanding. It's not bad. Because of this... What we coughing for? Everybody sick?...Because of this... and the reason I went in the expanded along this line is because verse 24 last week told us that we are created by God in righteousness and in true purity, through holiness. Twenty four.

That's why 25, Wherefore ... 'wherefore' can be translated 'because of this.' Because of this what? Being created in righteousness and truly pure. See it's an inside job.

Because of this being created in righteousness and truly pure by the grace and the love of

God.. .Because of this being created in righteousness and truly pure, you put away, completely lay to rest the lie that you have been and were living and each one of you speak the truth using a quotation from the Word with his believing neighbor for we are members one of another in the Body of the Church.

Robinson {Edward} said, he translated, 'speak every man truth with his neighbor' and he said it's from Zachariah 8:16 which adds force to what is said by using a quote. That's why I translated that. I think that' s great. It adds force to what is said. If you're speaking to someone, it adds force to what you say by using a quote, a quotation from God's Word. In other words, ' you share the Word with them.' That' s why I went with that translation. I want to give it to you again in this sense.

Speak the truth using a quotation from the Word, which means 'share the Word.' Quote the Word to them. Tell them what the Word says, with his believing neighbor. Why? For we are members one of another in the Body of the Church. This verse is just mind blowing.

Here, you have a born-again believer neighbor who needs to grow up a little more. So what do you do? Each one speak the truth to that neighbor, that believer, using the Word, quoting the Word because we' re members one of another in the Body of the Church. It's a real positive thing to do.

Verse 26 in King James reads, Be angry.. .ha ha... we like that one, don't we. Be ye angry and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath.

Here is a verse of Scripture that' s very, very difficult for most people. And it' s not too easy for us either. But I think we are able to share the truth of the greatness of this and it's been burning in my heart for a long time to do this with our people.

Everybody has problems with ' how can you be angry and not sin?' You know, how can raise hell with something and not be sinful in doing it? Teed off and not be sinful. And how can you go... and what does it mean 'don't let the sun go down upon your wrath?' See.

In the context, here, verses 26 and 27 deal with your believing neighbor, specifically. Then the Greek word for ' anger' which is from the root orge, o-r-g-long-e means 'anger together with the desire of revenge .' That' s bad. That' s a heavy. The Hebrew word means ' to kill, and all the tumults of passion that terminate in killing.' So it's a real heavy word when it said ' be angry.'

And the way I believe it's used in God' s Word, ' be ye angry' means ' it's a long time anger with your believing neighbor until a change has ensued.' The desire to... of revenge is a change. And I, knowing the Word in the light of the new birth, it's where a change finally comes about. Until that time, you just, long-term, you just stay put witnessing the Word, sharing the Word. You do not dislike the believing neighbor; you simply dislike that he is not fully accepting the Word and walking on it. So it' s a long-term anger until a change has ensued. You just stay faithful.

I don't know what else to do with those words. It is a righteous anger. Yet it is a righteous anger without sin.

Among the scholars, there is a disagreement on these words. Well, I don't know about my being a scholar; that I don' t anything about being about. But it's simple to me because righteous anger is commanded by God's Word when it says ' be ye angry.' Well, the scholars can fight about it. I don' t care. It' s a command. Not just permitted to get teed once in a while when somebody' s off of God' s Word, a believer is off of God's Word. You' re always teed off righteously at any believer, born-again believer, who is off of God' s Word. And for those of us in the Way Ministry, it' s been a lifetime.

Get into it with them on... Oh what subject do you want to talk about? Baptism? Food? One God? See. All that stuff.

The Aramaic is accurate in the words ' and sin not.' It literally translates ' and you will not sin.' Again, this ' be angry and sin not' is that figure gnome. Quotation. A citation from the Old Testament. It' s from Psalm 4:4. But in King James, Psalm 4:4, it's translated 'stand in awe.' The real sense of the Hebrew is ' one of admonition;' sin not. Where we' re admonished to not sin. Sin not.

' Let not the sun go down on your wrath. ' Ha ha. That again is beautiful. People went to bed when the sun went down, when it got dark. That's when they went to bed. So what that simply is saying, ha ha, ' don't go to bed teed off.' Don' t let the sun go down on your wrath. In other words, go to bed; don' t go to bed mad. ' When you go to bed' is what it means. Let not the sun go down when you go to bed. And they went to bed when the sun went down. When it got dark, they went to bed, see.

' Upon your wrath.' And the word ' wrath' here is basically ' irritation.' Ha ha. Previously when I taught Ephesians, I made mention of this fact, ' don' t let righteous anger shake you, wondering if it was right on. When you go to bed, go to sleep.'

Now, this is what we have done with it in the literal, ha ha, according to usage. I got more papers up here than Carter has liver pills, or something. Then, I can' t find my... whatever it is I take off of it.

Okay, verse 26. You be righteously angry.. .this is literal according to usage.. .and you will not be sinning. Don't go to bed even with a momentary irritation, ha ha.

I don't think you get nearly as much fun out of this as I do. It's neat. It's absolutely scrumptious, see. At the opening, is that heavy word, remember? Anger. So it's a real heavy time. So what he is saying, in the heavy time, when your standing on God' s Word  and sharing that with the  believing  neighbor, you' re righteously angry... you're not sinning. And  you don't  even go to  bed with a momentary irritation. In other Words, when you go to bed, thank God the day is over. Say your last prayer and start snoring.

Boy, that would save a lot of sleeping pills, wouldn' t it? Practicing that principle. Boy, oh boy, what a tremendous Word. And hardly anybody understands verse 26. They argue about it, but they don' t get the understanding.

Now this is the expanded one according to understanding, I hope. And again, I would like to just lay some things before the Corps, and especially before the Research Department. I translated the first part of verse 26, You always stay angry with an all-out desire to have them to change which anger will not be sin on your part.

Then I have another translation of that first part of it: You be righteously angry, 'teed off' with sin... 'Teed off' I put in quotes. But don't  you sin  by acting  ' holier than thou'  vaunting  yourself  by acting so righteously like you never sin.

I do not know which one of those two the Research Department feels would be the better. The last part of the phrase that I translated which would go with both of these that I have given you here on the expanded one for understanding. This, the last part, goes with that first one and with the second ... also.. .even if it is only a momentary irritation.  When you go to  bed, go to sleep. That's what I did with it.

Now, verse 27. King James says, Neither (or neither) give place to the Devil. The word 'place' is simply a portion, a part. No believer will give full place to the Devil, but he may be giving a part, a portion. He' ll mark off a spot, ' this is Devil' s permission over here, over here, no permission, you know. And you really give the Devil a portion or a spot if you stew about it after you go to bed and you toss and you tum and can' t sleep.

This word 'the Devil,' ' the Devil' in the Aramaic is a very interesting and exciting Word to me and it blesses my heart. It' s a compound word where the first part means ' to eat' or ' to devour.' The latter

' to slander' or ' to accuse. '  So when I got to translating  this, literally according  to usage, verse 27 reads: Do not give any portion or space or an opportunity to the Devil. So I used those three words synonymously: portion, space, opportunity. Do not give any portion or space or an opportunity to the Devil.

The expanded according to understanding: And you will not give a toehold, an opportunity or an occasion for the Devil to eat you. Ha ha. I get more fun than you ever will out of working this stuff, huh.

You see, and to me, that communicates to my understanding. John 10:10. The thief cometh not but for to what? [Steal, kill, and destroy] Right. To eat you out. To beat you. And that's why that Aramaic word, on the word ' Devil' really thrilled me.

And that ' s why I put it into the expanded translation: And you will not give a ' toehold.' Now, at L.E.A.D., you know how important it is to get a what? [Toehold] Ha ha. And when you' re really climbing in, you' re blessed for a toehold. How thankful you are when you get a foothold. Now the adversary can never get a foothold in a believer' s life until he first has a toehold. That's why I translated it that way.

Do not give... and you will not give a toehold ... shave all the rocks off... an opportunity or an occasion for the Devil to eat you. And that' s exactly what he likes to do to believers.

Now we go to verse 28. King James says, Let him that stole steal not more: but rather let him labor, working with his hands the thing which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth. And here again, is another great work that I believe should be in our research journal GMIR, Walter' s work on " Workers for God."

It' s just tremendous where he... you know... he just goes into God' s men are called many things in the Word. They' re called: fellow workers, ministers, or servants, slaves, fellow slaves, partners, messengers, soldiers, fellow soldiers, athletes, fellow athletes, stewards, ambassadors, witnesses, all of those. And he covers them so beautifully. And I love very much how he covered the word ' slave,' because it' s a much stronger word than to be a minister, or to be a servant. It is to be one who is branded, marked out, sold out. And baby, from that day on, there are no ifs, and' s, or but' s. You never budge on it. You are branded. Most believers are never branded. They may be servants, they may be ministers, but they are not branded. When you' re branded, you stay faithful. You do not budge. You do not change. You stay put. If all hell breaks loose, you still live the believing Word.

I think the prophet once said, If I was in the midst of hell, God I know you' d be there. (Psalm 139:8) He' d be there. That' s the doulos. That, of course, is just a tremendous piece of work.

And the other great part that I think... and this is a second piece that I want the Corps to master before next Wednesday night, " Workers for God," the work on ' witness.' You see, it's the same word basically that's translated ' martyr,' see. And we got a lot of those canonized. That's not at all what a witness is. A witness is a living example, not a dead one. The word 'martyr' simply means that you lay down your life in witnessing. And boy, when you put the doulos together with ' witness,' then you' ve got power for abundant living. It's just a fantastic work by Walter and I' m real grateful that it was published. Because once it' s in print, people can take a look at it if they want to.

I'd like a cup of coffee, please.

Now, we are in verse 28. The Aramaic translation is ' and he who was stealing.' I understand it from the English, ' let him that stole,' past tense. The Aramaic is real simple, real strong. ' And he, the one who is born again, who was, past tense, stealing.'

Thank you.

His whole life was one of those before he was born again.

Whenever you bring a cup of coffee to a right-hand man, you put the handle to the right. When you serve a cup of coffee to a left-hand man, you put it on the left-hand side and put the handle to the left. Corps principle number seven or something, ha ha. Mrs. Wierwille would say, Well, be thankful you even get a cup of coffee. [Laughter] Ah, you're wonderful.

See, ' let him who stole, steal no more.' 'Stole and steal,' that' s a figure of speech and is polyptoton p-o-l-y-p-t-o-t-o-n. It' s a repetition of the same root word in different parts of speech or reflections. But, that's not earth shaking right now in my heart.

You see, in some Eastern culture, it was not considered a sin or a shame to steal because that's the way they lived, the only way they lived. Somebody told me... or not only told me, one of our people, but it was in a national magazine, that the basic culture of Russia today is to steal. And in some respects I can understand this. If you don't have anything and you're starving to death and there' s a loaf of bread you can get a hold of... steal the dam thing. I understand that.

So this verse is really sharp, really sharp. Let him who stole, even though that man previously considered it the way to live and there was no shame in it, no sin in it. He said, Well, let that fellow who stole, steal no more. Something has happened on the inside of that man. Something that happened, where He is able to meet all of our need according to His riches in glory. Christ in you, the hope of glory. More than conquerors.

A record in the Old Testament, I forget where it is, but it's in there, that it' s never, you never need to borrow or steal bread or... what is that in the Old Testament? Begging bread. One person stand and tell me. {Psalm 37:25, I have been young and now am old; yet have I seen the righteous forsaken, nor His seed begging bread.} Psalm 27:25 who? {Psalm 37:25} 37:25. All the years, he's never seen the righteous to have to do what? {Beg bread} Beg bread.

First of all, I wish the Christian world could hear this. Secondly, I wish our government in the United States could understand it. The Word says, If you don't work, you don' t eat. A lot of that stuff. Well, what we've been doing is stealing from the people who are willing to work to give to the people who don' t want to work. That's a bunch of crap. That's stealing. That's why this verse is so hot in my soul tonight. Let him who stole, quit stealing, dang it. See.

Many years ago I was really knocked for a loop along some of this line in India, from Dr. Williams. I think he loved India maybe like I love the United States, I don' t know. Because only a man knows how much he loves his own country, I guess.

But... as we were traveling together, he said to me, Dr. Wierwille, I hear you have whores in the United States.

You know, I never had given it a thought. I just took it for granted. [Laughter] And I said, yeah. He said, Why does a rich country like the United States have whores?

And I said, I don't know.

And he said, I can't understand it. Cannot your women make enough money to live? Yeah, but they figure that' s cheaper and more pleasurable or something, I don' t know. And he said, Well, I think it's sinful that the United States has whores.

And I said, What do you mean?

And he said to me, why, I can understand India. He said we don' t enough food, we don' t have enough of anything hardly for a lot of people. And we have whores because that' s the only way they can continue to live physically.

And I thought to myself, well boy, that' s slapping me in the face good. And I took it as a wonderful lesson. There is no excuse in the United States for any women being a whore because she doesn' t need to get screwed and paid for it in order to get money so she can live. There's plenty of work available and if there isn' t she ought to get born again, then there' s a guarantee of work. ..other work, available. I tell you, when you' re honest, some of these men in other countries have some real logic behind their thinking. How would you have liked to have handled that? I just simply admitted, Well, I think we' re wrong in the United States. But I said, I think you' re wrong in India, too, because no reason to have whores here if you get them born again.

So I don' t know. But this verse today as I worked the final working on this verse 28 is when my heart really went back and burned with that truth that Dr. Williams had stated. Because in many Eastern cultures, it was not considered as sin or as shame to steal, if it was a matter of livelihood. You sometimes wonder who will live in the greatest condemnation before God and justice and judgment when the time comes.

For in most of what are called poor countries even, there is sufficient money, food, and other things for the people to live if those in positions of authority were not so selfish and egotistical, and want it for themselves , and let the rest of the world die... or a country die.

The word ' labor' in verse 28 is the word which literally means ' hard work resulting in fatigue.' That's how I felt coming from the woods last night. And I didn' t do anything. It was just hard work being there with the rest of you. Today I got so tired of being with some, I came home. Ah, you' re wonderful.

' Working with his hands' is an Eastern cultural type of thing. Today in our culture, you could have it, you know, the truth is working with your mind or working with your hand, whatever you' re working at. But in Eastern culture, every son was to be trained to work with his hands, even if he was the son of a king. Had to learn a trade, a profession of business.

Jesus Christ was a saddle maker. He made them to ride, I guess, what do you want? Tennessee Walkers , or? See. I think not only did he do that, Paul did it, too, you know. Someday I'm going to find a...or Walter, or some of those, are going to find me a manuscript to prove it. .. and a wonderful carpenter by trade. Many times doing carpentry work and being a saddle maker were sort of in the same household, because building carpentry and having saddles to use for their business and carrying on, were very, very closely aligned. Well, I won' t argue the point, but I wish we' d keep looking.

II Thessalonians.. .Do your hands ever get so dry you can hardly hold anything? Golly, mine are so dry tonight, I wonder why? II Thessalonians, chapter 3:10... this we commanded you that if any would not work, neither should he what? [Eat] Right. Even unemployment is no excuse for stealing. He just doesn' t eat. Goes and gets work. Boy, when I first saw the greatness of these principles many years ago, and then of course, I uniquely by God' s grace, inculcated that into our W.O.W. program and very dynamically in the Corps leadership.

Acts 11:1-18
May 4, 1976
I do not know from God’s Word whether this teaching or the first teaching was the one that brought
them to the new birth where they received the fulness of the spirit. Maybe they had a coffee break,
went to the bathroom. Maybe they had a little bit of lunch, and then came back, and Peter taught
again. Maybe they broke up again and had ice cream with marshmallows on top and then he taught
again. I just don’t know, but I know that while Peter was teaching one of’ these times, (whether it
was the first time or the fourth), that one of those times this tremendous record in Acts 10 occurred.
And the 11th chapter simply is a continued unfolding of what occurred afterward, later.
Acts 11:1
“And” - now
“had” – delete – not in the texts
“Received” – dechomai That’s interesting to me. When they heard, back in Judaea, they did not hear
that they lambanō-ed. You and I know from chapter 10 that they had lambanō-ed. And yet the
record here in Acts 11 says they only heard that they dechomai-ed. Sounds like Samaria, doesn’t it?
Whether this is due to the fact that these were Gentiles and that they just didn’t just didn’t want to
say, “they spoke in tongues”, I don’t know, but it looks sort of like it – because, “No Gentiles could
do that, you know that, without becoming proselytes, going through all the ritual.” Yet I have shown
you from Acts 10 that he was not a proselyte. Cornelius was not a proselyte.
Acts 11:2
“contended” - were contending
“with” - against
Boy, the moment Peter got down there they jumped on him with both feet. In essence they said
“Peter, just what in the blazes were you doing?” So they immediately started a fight; contending with
him.
Acts 11:3
“men uncircumcised, and didst eat with them” - That’s what really disturbed them. Whenever you ate
with someone, you know what that meant; that you weren’t going to knife them in the back; that they
belong to your family, your fellowship. We read it from Revelation 3:20.
They didn’t object for him to fraternize with Gentiles because there were certain laws that made it
possible for a Jew to have some relationship with a Gentile, but the one thing they would never do is
eat with them. And here they really got on Peter and said, “You know, you not only went in to men
that are uncircumcised, the dogs, but you ate with them!” And if you think that was a cool argument,
you’re wrong. It was a hot one. They were really indignant; they were angry; they were teed off; and
this is brother against brother; born again believers teed off at each other.
Acts 11:4
“rehearsed the matter” - having begun
192
“expounded it” - set forth
“by” - in
“unto” - to
Acts 11:5
“trance” – ekstasis – transliterates into the word: ecstasy. I described it once as “a dormant state of
mental activity.”
“vision” - picture, full color
“let down” - sent down
“from” - out
“even” as far as - It came right down to him.
Acts 11:6
“Upon” - unto - You know, to that vision.
“when I had fastened mine eyes” - having gazed - I like the translation in King James; “fastened
mine eyes.” I like that because to me that communicates; to set your eyeball on; to concentrate; to put
you mind to it. “having gazed” is literally accurate according to the text. In my head, when you fasten
your eyes on something, you glue them down; you stay put right on that thing.
“air” - heaven
Acts 11:7-8
“Not so” - by no means. In other words, he’s real shook by it; “By no means!”
“common” - defiled
“at any time” - at no time
Acts 11:9
“the” - a
“me” - delete
“again” - a second time
“call” - make
“common” - defiled
Acts 11:10
“was done” - came to pass. And this came to pass three times.
193
Acts 11:11
“already” - delete
“come unto” - stood before
Knowing the Oriental culture, we know they didn’t knock on the door, but they stood and they
called. Who was that in the Old Testament that stood out in front of the prophet’s place and called?
Naaman? (II Kings 5:9)
Acts 11:12
“the spirit bade me go with them” - revelation
“nothing doubting” - doubting nothing
“accompanied” - came with
These were born again believers of Judean background. I believe they came by revelation with Peter.
I think Peter took them along with him because God told him to, because God knew what a problem
Peter would have when he got to Jerusalem.
Acts 11:13
“shewed” - told
“an” - the
“which stood and said” - standing and saying
“unto him” - delete
“men” - delete
“call” - send
Do I need to give you that again? All right, I’ll give you the accuracy of the text for verse 13:
And he told us how he had seen the angel in his house standing and saying, “Send to
Joppa and send for Simon whose surname is Peter.”
Acts 11:14
“tell thee” - laleō - speak.
Boy, what a fantastic verse. How are people going to know how to get saved unless people do what?
Speaks it; Speak words Speak words. Speak words. And those words have to be the words that the
Holy Spirit hath spoken in His Word. That’s how people get saved. Faith or believing comes by
what? Hearing. And hearing comes by what? The Word! The Word! The Word! Man, how that thing
fits: “Who shall speak words.” It’s the only way we have of communicating; words.
“saved” – sōzō - to be made whole
Again I constantly marvel at the way we allow ourselves to be tricked and live below par. I am so
absolutely convinced that when people got born again of God’s spirit in the first century Church, they
194
were made whole, mentally, physically, spiritually and every other way. Now the Adversary tricked
them later on; they lost; they were robbed of it at times. But when they got saved, they were made
whole. Gosh! Wouldn’t it be wonderful to get the Church back to this? What a fantastic privilege to
have the joy of endeavoring to teach the Word to get people back to it. Since believing comes by
hearing, and hearing comes by the Word, I know of no way to build believing in people but by the
Word. And so, as the Word continues to build, I don’t know if very many of us older people will ever
see it because we are so acclimatized to defeat. It’s almost impossible for us to believe God’s Word
when it says, “to be made whole.” But I do believe that there are a lot of children being born and
children to be born, that, if we continue to teach the greatness of God’s Word, when those children
are born again, they are going to be made whole just like that word sōzō means; mentally, physically,
spiritually and every other way. I think this is one of the great places we are going to see the physical
deliverance of a lot of people as the Word’s being taught. Boy, what a tremendous thing. “Who shall
speak words”; speak words. Somebody’s got to speak it. It’s got to be words. And you can’t speak
the words that will save people unless you know them. Right? That’s why we need to know the
Word, so we can speak the Word to people - just like Peter did. He spoke the words.
“all thy house” – i.e. all the family, the relatives, everybody there
Acts 11:15
“as I began” - my beginning
“as on us” - even as on us
Now what does that tell me? It tells me that it doesn’t say that it was the first time he was speaking,
but “as he was speaking,” and “my beginning to speak.” Therefore it had to be at least in the second
message, maybe the third, when this thing really occurred in Acts 10.
You see that, “my beginning”? It got me all excited. It says in King James, “as I began to speak.”
That can’t be it. You know why? Because believing comes by what? Hearing. And they had never
heard the Word taught. Therefore, Peter now starts speaking. Therefore, it couldn’t have been just as
he started saying, “I greet you in the name of Jesus Christ, and I’m glad to be here with you from
Joppa tonight...” Then they all started. NO, NO, NO! You know better! That’s where I got my key.
“And my beginning, my beginning to speak … fell on them even as on us also.” Got it? Isn’t that
nice?
Walter - - That ‘beginning’ is not a noun. It’s a form of the verb; ’in my beginning to speak.’”
Which could have been the second or third message because believing comes by what? Hearing. And
hearing by what? The Word. Let’s say he was in his second or third message and when he started
that; as he got into that message, that’s when they spoke in tongues. I think that’s tremendously
exciting. That puts the Word together, because believing comes by hearing, and hearing by the Word.
You don’t get saved just by someone standing up in front and saying, “Well, God bless you. I greet
you in the name of Jesus Christ.” No. Faith cometh by hearing; they had to hear some of the Word. I
think that’s great. That to me is electrifying. Which “fell on them even as on us also” - in Acts 2:1 &
4! Isn’t that wonderful? Boy, how beautifully that makes it fit.
“at the beginning” - in the beginning - when it was poured out in Acts 2:1-4
Acts 11:16
“the Holy ghost” – pneuma hagion
195
Put this together with that record in Acts 10:47, where he said, “Can any man forbid water”, which I
do not believe he ever administered because as he spoke, he thought about water, but then he
remembered the Word of the Lord, how “John baptized with water but ye shall be baptized with
pneuma hagion...” and he never water baptized them.
Acts 11:17
“forasmuch then” – the text reads, “if therefore”
“gift” - I think the word there, Walter, is dōrea instead of charisma. Walter - - right?
“us” - us also - Boy, you see the word “also” keeps coming up in here. Here it’s used. “Gave them
the like dorea as unto us also who believed on the Lord Jesus. Who was I, that I would hinder?”
“could withstand” – would even try to hinder - If God said John baptized with water; you are going
to be baptized with pneuma hagion, who was I? Even though I thought for a minute, water baptize
them; give them the water treatment, who was I to hinder God. You talk about records of the Word
that put speaking in tongues and the manifestations right up where God wants them; that’s it.
Acts 11:18
“When they” - Now having
“held their peace” – ceased – same word as “ceased” in Acts 21:14.
Those that had laid it on him, and were against him, and jumped down his throat when he got to
Jerusalem, they ceased; they shut up. They ceased arguing with him. And what did they do? They
glorified God! Boy, it’s a tremendous thing! I wish to God they would be half that honest with The
Way Ministry at times today. Give us a listen like on Jesus is not God. And having heard these things
they’d cease arguing and they’d glorify God. We think these people were bad in Jerusalem. Well,
they aren’t near as bad as most Christians are against each other today and especially when it comes
to the accuracy of God’s Word. So I wouldn’t be pointing any fingers at those fellows at Jerusalem
that called Peter on the carpet. Because boy, if you remember that culture and that teaching about a
Gentile and a Jew, of background, eating together, you know that’s like adding water and oil. Mixing
it up, can’t be done. But boy, after he’d had his say; he laid it all out, they ceased their arguments
against him and they glorified God. They praised the Lord; had a terrific be-lievers meeting.
“also to the Gentiles” - to the Gentiles also – the “also” has to go after “Gentiles.”
“granted” - given
“repentance” - is to confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe God raised him from the
dead. And the one proof they had, and the only proof they had, was, they spoke in tongues. It was the
proof that they had received repentance unto life and that the Gentiles also had received the same as
they had in the beginning. Look at the criteria in the early Church. Boy! There are very few of us
who realize the depth of this thing because even with the bitterness between the blacks and the
whites, this was a lot deeper than black and white fighting. This was so deep that the Gentiles were
considered worse than dogs. You’d feed a dog but you’d let a stupid Gentile starve to death. You’d at
least give the dog the crumbs off of your table, but not a Gentile. How little we have appreciated the
greatness of God and the manifestation. The only thing that convinced those who were against Peter,
when he showed up in Jerusalem with the six brethren, was when all seven of them stood up and
witnessed that, yes, they did speak in tongues. “We heard them.”
196
And therefore, they praised the Lord; they glorified God saying, “To the Gentiles also, God hath
granted repentance unto life.” What a forward move this was in that early Church. It should have
been back there in Acts 2 already, but it wasn’t because God cannot move any faster than people are
willing to receive and to believe. It took God all those years to wait on people to move. Taking Peter
from one point to another, not that he forced Peter; He didn’t brainwash him in the wrong sense, but
he sure got brainwashed in the right sense, that he was able to go to the household of Cornelius,
minister the Word, eat with them, and see this thing come to pass.
Well, these are the chapters and the verses that brought us into the ministry. Aren’t you thankful? I
am too; that the Gentiles didn’t have to go through circumcision (all the law), then get water
baptized, everything else, but they could just come, believe God’s Word, receive repentance;
remission unto life, manifest the power of the holy spirit, and be inside of the Body.
That’s it. That’s all there is.
Dr. -- any questions?
Someone asks -- Back in chapter 10, when the angel of the Lord appeared to Cornelius, do you
know any more about why the angel himself does not bring the message that he told Cornelius that
Peter would bring? Why didn’t the angel just tell Cornelius what Peter would later tell him?
Dr. -- I believe that the reason for this is because God, in his foreknowledge, knew that Peter would
tell it and that what he could know by his sense-knowledge, with renewed mind, Peter was able to
give therefore the angel did not have to give it. That’s all I know about it.
Someone else -- Could it maybe have something to do with the Church needing to accept the gentiles
into the Church, so they had a member of the Church, a pillar of the Church, work the deal with the
Gentiles to receive, so they would be accepted of the brethren rather than just accepting the fact that
an angel had ministered to them?
Dr. -- Could be. I think Peter was one of the most logical people to bring the Gentiles in. I think he
was a very logical man to be chosen. Had Paul done this trip, it would have been a much more
difficult trip in Jerusalem. Because Peter had been one of them, he was respected. Even though he
was respected, they still argued with him. They jumped right down his throat. Peter bringing this
thing to pass, I think is a real phenomenal thing. I think it’s logical and I think it’s beautiful that he
did. I think it made it much easier for the Jerusalem brethren to move in than if some renegade had
done it.
Another question -- Was it common for Romans to speak Aramaic? Were not Cornelius and his men
from Italy itself?
Dr. -- I believe that Cornelius and those spoke Estrangelo Aramaic.
Another question - - In Acts 11:16, could that “remember” be God telling him or is it just a recall of
what he knew? How much likely is it that God could have told him?
Dr. - - Oh, I think that he just brought it back to his senses head; remembered. I do not think it was
revelation there. I think he just remembered it.